Wednesday 5 May 2021

Income Inequality is Not the Same as Poverty

Income inequality does not necessarily imply higher levels of poverty.

Over the years I have published a number of columns on inequality. Among these are “Fleeing Equality,” “Redistributive Injustice,” “The Rich Do Not Exist,” and others reproduced in my book “Reflections on Freedom.” Invariably, this topic brings me the most hateful correspondence. Undeterred, I will try again motivated, this time, by the excellent analysis presented by Steven Pinker in his latest book, “Enlightenment Now.”

Favela (slum) on the outskirts of Salvador de Bahia, Brazil. (World Bank).

Let’s begin by defining the terms as Voltaire demanded. I am defending only the inequality that results from legitimate creation of value in goods and services. The way in which inequality comes about matters. Those who get ahead as a result of government-granted privileges, unfair business practices, dishonesty, corruption, cronyism, etc., are engaging in illicit activities and must be prosecuted vigorously. What offends me is not inequality as such, but that inequality that results from illicit gains.

- Advertisement -

Let me borrow an example offered by Dr. Pinker. J. K. Rowling is the British novelist who created the Harry Potter series that sold more than 400 million copies. In her “rags to riches” life story, Rowling went from living on state benefits to being the world’s first billionaire author. She is one of the richest persons in the world, and has given away much of her fortune to charity.

We have voluntarily handed over to Ms. Rowling a portion of our capital for the pleasure of reading her books, or watching the Harry Potter films. We made her very rich, thus increasing inequality, and this has not made anyone worse off. The same can be said of the products produced by Bill Gates’ Microsoft, Steve Jobs’ Apple, and so many others who have enhanced our lives, and we in turn rewarded them financially.

Wealth is not, in the overused analogy, a fixed size pie that needs to be forcibly distributed to achieve some artificial equality. Global wealth, as measured by economic growth, is a pie that is ever increasing, and providing larger slices for everyone. Although granted, the slices may not be of the same size for all.

And here is the paradox. As Pinker notes, life “must have begun in a state of original equality, because when there is no wealth, everyone has equal shares of nothing.” It is only when wealth begins to be created that some will end up with more than others. When a society starts to create meaningful opportunities for wealth, some people are likely to take greater advantages of those opportunities.

- Advertisement -

“Whether by luck, skill, or effort,” gains will be disproportionate. Absent some artificial income redistribution scheme, “absolute” inequality is a mathematical necessity. I placed “absolute” in quotations to distinguish it from “relative” inequality. Absolute inequality is the difference between the richest and the poorest. As countries get richer, some individual will get richer than others, but everyone will be relatively better off. What is relevant is how much we earn or consume, not how high or low we rank in relation to others.

Income inequality is notoriously difficult to measure. One of our best inequality measuring tools is the Gini coefficient in several versions. The Gini ratio works something like this. A Gini coefficient of zero means perfect equality, for example, if everyone has the same income. A Gini coefficient of one means that one person gets all the income – perfect inequality. In practice, Gini values range from 0.25 for the most egalitarian countries, to 0.70 for those with a highly unequal distribution. Poor African nations show high inequality, whereas wealthy Scandinavian nations are the most egalitarian.

Measurements get more complicated when we consider social transfers such as food stamps, and other assistance for needy families. In the late 2000s, the United States Gini coefficient before social transfers was 0.486; after transfers inequality decreases to 0.378. Even more interesting, if we measure the Gini coefficient on what we consume, rather than on income, the recently reported increase in inequality disappears.

The Gini coefficients shows that inequality worldwide is declining, but we make an analytical and moral mistake when we focus narrowly on income inequality. What is really important is how well-off people are, not how they rank in relation to others.

Source: Panampost.com

- Advertisement -

FACT CHECK:
We strive for accuracy in its reports. But if you see something that doesn’t look right, send us an email. The Q reviews and updates its content regularly to ensure it’s accuracy.

Q Costa Rica
Reports by QCR staff

Related Articles

Carlos Alvarado: “No Growth and Poverty Reduction Without Economic Stability”

QCOSTARICA - The International Monetary Fund (IMF) approved a $1.7 billion...

MOST READ

Caja will start vaccination against covid-19 of people with risk factors between 18 and 57 years old

QCOSTARICA - In order to maintain the rate of vaccination against covid-19 in the health areas that show the greatest progress in this process...

Today’s Covid News: Daily cases of COVID-19 continues to decline; young adults most infected

QCOSTARICA - After breaking all records last week, the number of new daily cases of Covid-19 in Costa Rica continues on the decline, according...

Latin American countries establish space programs despite limitations on ground

Q REPORTS (Associated Press) Mars missions, astronauts coming and going at the International Space Station, China’s increasingly ambitious space program. Space-related news is flowing,...

OIJ arrested a CCSS official suspected of simulating vaccination of elderly man

QCOSTARICA - The Organismo de Investigación Judicial (OIJ) detained the health worker suspected of carrying out an anomalous vaccination against the new coronavirus to...

After 200 years, two women manage to preside over Congress in the same period

QCOSTARICA - It took 200 years, but it was achieved, two women to preside over Congress in the same legislative period (2018-2022). On Saturday, May...

Judiciary compensates teacher taken off a plane by mistake for not paying alimony

QCOSTARICA - A PhysEd teacher managed to get the Judiciary to agree to pay him just over ¢1.2 million colones (US$2,000) for taking him...

What to watch for to be sure you get the vaccine

QCOSTARICA - The moment has arrived to get the vaccine. With the apparent "irregular" vaccination in the health area of the Tres Rios made...

Entertainment Or Nature. What’s Better In Costa Rica?

Costa Rica is a country filled with beautiful nature, miles of coastline, and even volcanic formations. All these things make it a wonderful place...

Colombia’s Protests Against President Duque Explained

QCOLOMBIA – Nineteen people have died and hundreds more have been injured in protests in Colombia against President Iván Duque Márquez’s tax bill, aimed...

WANT TO STAY UP TO DATE WITH THE LATEST!

Get our daily newsletter with the latest posts directly in your mailbox. Click on the subscribe and fill out the form. It's that simple!

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.