Home Blog Page 5

President Fernández trashes her Colombian counterpart

0

RICO’S Q —Costa Rican President Laura Fernández, during a joint press conference on Tuesday in Barranquilla with Colombian President Abelardo de la Espriella, generated significant media coverage by using the word “basura” (garbage/trash) to describe members of Colombia’s organized crime and drug trafficking networks.

Her literal quote regarding criminals fleeing law enforcement operations in Colombia was:

“The effort that the president is making in the fight against drug trafficking, that cleansing he is carrying out in Colombia, does not mean that Costa Rica is going to receive the garbage that you are cleaning out of your homeland.” (Original: “El esfuerzo que el presidente realiza en el combate del narcotráfico, esa limpieza que está realizando de Colombia, no significa que Costa Rica vaya a recibir a la basura que usted está limpiando de su patria.”)

President De la Espriella used similar terminology during the meeting, stating to Fernández: “I am not going to let the garbage pass over to Costa Rica, do not worry.”

The “trashy” interchange occurred when the Colombian President asked Fernández to consider eliminating the visa requirement for Colombian citizens entering the country.

Currently, Colombia does not require visas for Costa Ricans, whereas Costa Rica maintains that requirement for Colombians, and therefore De la Espriella proposed moving toward “migration reciprocity.”

With her clumsy use of language, Laura Virginia embarrasses the country and creates unnecessary problems.

According to media outlets like Teletica and El Observador, Fernández specified that she was referring to hitmen, drug traffickers, and transnational organized crime groups trying to relocate operations to Costa Rica, not the general Colombian populace.

She often has to backtrack, explain, and justify what she meant by what she said, rather than what she meant by the words written for her.

Among these, the President’s statements regarding Mexico, Panama, Nicaragua, and Colombia.

On March 6, Fernández stated that, for her, Mexico represented an example of “where we do not want to end up,” referring to organized crime and the situation in certain cities within that country.

Subsequently, between May 15 and 20, she addressed the situation with Panama, declaring that she would not allow domestic producers to be mistreated; this occurred amidst disputes over agricultural trade restrictions and accusations of a trade blockade.

On June 12, regarding Nicaragua, Fernández spoke of “the form of government they have chosen to have,” referring to the political situation under the regime of Daniel Ortega and Rosario Murillo.

Later, Foreign Minister Manuel Tovar publicly explained that the Costa Rican government’s position was to condemn the repression and advocate for the restoration of democratic processes in that country.

Without doubt, such expressions reflect a problem in the way international relations are being handled.

“There is no doubt that Laura Fernández is far from possessing the understanding and respect required in international relations, especially with Latin America. Her clumsy use of language and speech embarrasses the country and creates unnecessary problems,” former presidential candidate Claudio Alpízar recently published a hard-hitting opinion column titled “En Boca de Callada No Entran Moscas” (No Flies Enter a Closed Mouth).

International relations are fundamental to the exchange between nations—now more than ever; the care and strategic approach we must adopt as a country in this area are of paramount importance. This necessitates a foreign policy characterized by dignity and sovereignty within a multipolar world.

“If the country continues to take clumsy steps and make ill-advised statements—appointing ambassadors who seek a four-year sabbatical rather than representing the nation—we could find ourselves in a real mess at any moment due to verbal indiscretions and actions that compromise us in conflicts that are not our own,” Alpízar noted in his column.

The summit. The state visit focused entirely on establishing a security alliance to counter regional “narco-terrorism” and improve maritime and intelligence-sharing capabilities between the two nations

 

 

 

- A word from our sponsors -

Pro-government lawmakers rejected a motion for a minute of silence for a Costa Rican who died in U.S.-ICE custody

0

Q COSTA RICA — The death of Costa Rican Carlos Josué Marchena Marchena—who died while in the custody of U.S. immigration authorities—sparked a confrontation on Monday, September 21, among the legislative blocs of Costa Rica’s Legislative Assembly.

The clash occurred after the ruling party—the Partido Pueblo Soberano (PPSO)—faction rejected a motion to observe a minute of silence in his memory.

The proposal sought to have the Legislative Plenary pay tribute to the deceased compatriot and express solidarity with his family. However, the initiative failed to secure the necessary votes for approval due to opposition from the 29 ruling-party lawmakers present for the vote.

The 24 lawmakers who supported the motion belong to opposition factions, including Liberación Nacional, Frente Amplio, Unidad Social Cristiana, and the Coalición Agenda Ciudadana.

The opposition held the tribute during a recess.

Following the rejection of the proposal, legislator José María Villalta of the Frente Amplio requested a legislative recess so that interested lawmakers could observe the minute of silence, even though it had not been authorized as an official act of the Plenary.

During this time, opposition lawmakers stood at their respective seats to remember Marchena and express their support for the Costa Rican man’s family.

Most members of PPSO left the legislative floor during the tribute. However, some ruling-party figures remained standing and participated in the observance.

Among them were the President of the Legislative Assembly, Yara Jiménez; legislator Reynaldo Arias Mora, a member of the Legislative Directorate; and legislator Robert Barrantes Camacho.

All three had voted against the motion but subsequently participated in the minute of silence called by the opposition legislators.

Why did the ruling party vote against it?

During the debate, ruling-party legislator José Miguel Villalobos justified his position by arguing that the motion had a political intent that went beyond merely expressing solidarity with the deceased’s family.

In his view, the proposal sought to indirectly question the United States government’s immigration policies, even though the text presented to the plenary session contained no explicit rejection of those policies.

Villalobos maintained that the intent should be analyzed not only based on what the motion stated but also on what, in his opinion, its proponents sought to convey.

Opposition legislators rejected this interpretation, arguing that the initiative was intended to express solidarity regarding the death of a Costa Rican citizen abroad.

Legislator Claudia Dobles, of the Citizen Agenda Coalition, stated that the tribute should be understood as a gesture of empathy toward a family facing the loss of one of its members.

Meanwhile, legislators from the Frente Amplio highlighted the importance of the Costa Rican state monitoring the conditions in which its citizens are held while in the custody of foreign immigration authorities.

A subsequent motion for reconsideration also failed to garner the necessary support to alter the initial decision.

Official position of the PPSO

Following the rejection of the motion, the PPSO’s legislative caucus issued a statement expressing condolences to Carlos Josué Marchena’s family and defending its decision to vote against the minute of silence.

“Our vote today against the motion presented in the plenary session does not signify indifference to this family’s pain,” the caucus stated, adding that it awaited clarification regarding the circumstances of the death.

However, legislators from the ruling party argued that the proposal sought to bring the debate over U.S. immigration policy into Congress and accused the opposition of trying to gain political advantage from the tragedy. “Our position stems from the view that such a painful situation should not be turned into a tool for the opposition to engage in political posturing,” they stated.

The group concluded that “a family’s grief deserves respect, prudence, and seriousness” and reiterated that it would not support initiatives that, in its view, turn a personal tragedy into a tool for political confrontation.

The case of the Costa Rican man who died in the United States

Carlos Josué Marchena Marchena had been detained by U.S. immigration authorities since January 2026 while his immigration status was being resolved.

He died in Louisiana, where he was in the custody of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

According to information released about the case, Marchena was found unconscious at the Winn Correctional Center. Facility staff initiated resuscitation efforts, and he was subsequently transported to Winn Parish Medical Center, where he was pronounced dead.

The Costa Rican man’s family has alleged that, during his detention, he faced difficulties regarding food and access to medication, in addition to experiencing health issues in the days leading up to his death.

These circumstances are among the concerns raised by his loved ones as the official cause of death awaits confirmation.

Marchena was scheduled to be deported to Costa Rica approximately two weeks after his death. His family was already preparing for his return after he had spent nearly eight months in ICE custody.

- A word from our sponsors -

Costa Rica among the top 20 countries in the world to live in 2026

0

Q COSTA RICA — Costa Rica has once again appeared in an international ranking that analyzes living conditions and opportunities offered by various countries to those considering establishing residence outside their home country.

The country ranked 20th globally in the Rumavi Global Relocation Index 2026, an assessment covering 192 countries and territories based on indicators related to quality of life, health, safety, economic conditions, and the ease with which foreign residents can adapt.

With a score of 68.7 out of 100, Costa Rica ranked ahead of destinations such as Spain, Panama, Switzerland, Uruguay, Canada, and Mexico in the overall standings.

The report was produced by Rumavi, a firm specializing in international consulting for relocation, residency, and investment.

The research utilizes 24 indicators distributed across four main components: finance and taxes; livability and health; safety and stability; and settlement and opportunities.

Unlike other studies that evaluate the well-being of the resident population solely, this index seeks to identify the conditions a person might encounter when moving to another country.

To do so, it incorporates factors such as the cost of living, healthcare systems, air quality, visa access, business opportunities, taxation of foreign-sourced income, and safety conditions.

According to results published by Rumavi, Costa Rica scored 72.5 points in finance and taxes; 74.5 in livability and health; 68.4 in safety and stability; and 60 points in settlement and opportunities.

Costa Rica outperforms Panama, Uruguay, and Canada

One notable aspect of the study is Costa Rica’s ranking relative to other countries in the Americas.

While Costa Rica reached the 20th position with 68.7 points, Panama appeared in 23rd place with 68.3 points, and Uruguay ranked 35th with 67.4 points.

Canada, meanwhile, ranked 41st with a score of 66.8.

The difference between Costa Rica and Canada is due to the set of variables used in the study, which considers fiscal, climatic, and economic aspects alongside traditional well-being indicators.

For instance, Canada received high ratings for banking infrastructure and English language access but recorded lower scores on specific indicators related to taxes and climate conditions.

In Costa Rica’s case, the study identified high scores regarding the tax treatment of foreign-sourced income, ease of obtaining visas, and property rights for non-citizens.

The livability and health component yielded Costa Rica’s highest score, at 74.5 out of 100 points.

Within this category, the research awarded the country 70 points for healthcare quality and 75 for the affordability of medical care.

Air quality scored 78 points, while climate conditions reached 76 and digital infrastructure registered 80.

These indicators are part of an assessment conducted by Rumavi regarding the feasibility of daily living in the country and access to services considered important for long-term residency.

Another result concerns the specific ranking for retirees.

Costa Rica ranked fifth globally among destinations for retirees, with a score of 73.5 out of 100—a category that places special emphasis on medical services, the cost of living, safety, and tax conditions.

The study also highlighted that the country offers a specific immigration category for pensioners—a feature factored into the assessment of how easy it is to settle in Costa Rica.

Security and business opportunities present challenges

Despite its ranking, the report also identifies areas where Costa Rica scores significantly lower.

One such area is street safety—an indicator that received 46.1 points out of 100—while the overall security and stability component scored 62.4.

The latter takes into account other variables, including the rule of law, political stability, the risk of conflict, and property rights for foreigners.

Regarding the economy, the research also points out limitations related to business development.

The entrepreneurial ecosystem scored 37 points, while business opportunities registered a score of 51.

Which countries top the global ranking?

In the 2026 overall rankings, Estonia took the top global spot with 72.8 out of 100 points, followed by Singapore with 72.6 and Malaysia with 72.

Portugal ranked fourth with 71.6 points, while Taiwan rounded out the top five with 71.4.

Lithuania, Hong Kong, Saint Kitts and Nevis, the Czech Republic, and Malta also featured among the top ten destinations.

According to the methodology published by Rumavi, the scores are derived from data provided by international bodies and studies, supplemented by the firm’s own estimates and assessments regarding specific variables.

In the case of Costa Rica, 14 of the 24 indicators rely on data identified by Rumavi as coming from institutional sources, while the remaining indicators incorporate other types of estimates or assessments.

- A word from our sponsors -

Cuba ‘surprised’ not to have diplomatic relations with Costa Rica after months without embassies

0

Q COSTA RICA — Cuba, Costa Rica, and the rupture of their diplomatic relations became the center of a dispute after Cuba claimed it never received formal notification from Costa Rica, despite the closure of both embassies announced in March and the withdrawal of diplomatic staff.

The Cuban Foreign Ministry maintained that the decision was publicly announced by Costa Rican Foreign Minister Manuel Tovar Rivera during a visit to the United States.

Costa Rican Foreign Minister Manuel Tovar was honored on Friday with the 2026 Pedro Luis Boitel Freedom Award during a ceremony held at Miami’s Freedom Tower. That same day, he confirmed his government’s decision to sever relations with Cuba, telling the Miami Herald the measure was not limited to closing the missions or sending officials home.

Cuba’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, known as MINREX, responded that it learned of the Costa Rican position through the press on September 18. “A rupture of diplomatic relations” with Cuba has occurred, Tovar told the US newspaper, according to the island’s Foreign Ministry.

The Cuban reaction was reported by the Diario de Cuba (DDC), noting that Cuba maintained the view that closing diplomatic missions did not equate to formally severing ties between the two states.

Disagreement over the embassy closures

Costa Rica announced the closure of its embassy in Cuba in March and asked Cuba to take an equivalent measure in Costa Rica. However, MINREX indicated that the then-Costa Rican Foreign Minister, Arnoldo André Tinoco, had communicated to them that those decisions “did not mean a rupture of diplomatic relations.”

Costa Rica’s Foreign Ministry confirmed to EFE that diplomatic ties with Cuba were severed, and Manuel Tovar stated that the measure went beyond the closure of the missions. The Cuban Foreign Ministry also cited Institutional Communication 076-2026, published by Costa Rica on March 18, 2026, under the title “Closure of the Costa Rican Embassy in Cuba and withdrawal of diplomatic staff from Cuba in Costa Rica.” According to MINREX, that communication did not mention a formal rupture.

Rodrigo Chaves, then President of Costa Rica, had offered a broader political definition of the decision during a public event. “Costa Rica does not recognize the legitimacy of the Cuban communist regime, given the mistreatment, repression, and undignified conditions suffered by the inhabitants of that beautiful island,” he stated.

The Cuban government took issue with the fact that Tovar had communicated the rupture to a South Florida media outlet before notifying Cuba. The Foreign Ministry attributed this behavior to “another act of subordination by the Costa Rican government to United States policy against Cuba.”

Cuba presented no evidence that Costa Rican authorities had made their decisions under pressure from Washington—neither at the time of the March announcement nor following the statements made by the current foreign minister.

Regional tensions and Costa Rica’s stance

Chaves further maintained that “we must cleanse the hemisphere of communists,” according to Reuters. His statements coincided with a period of growing estrangement between several Latin American governments and Cuba.

In February, the Costa Rican government asked its citizens to avoid non-essential travel to Cuba and recommended that those already on the island leave the country. The warning came amidst the collapse of the Cuban economy, following Donald Trump’s threat to impose tariffs on countries shipping crude oil to Cuba.

Friction between Cuba and Costa Rica had already surfaced earlier in 2024. That year, it was revealed that the Cuban ambassador to Costa Rica, Jorge Rodríguez, had pressured Liberal Progressive Party lawmaker Eliécer Feinzaig to stop meeting with Orlando Gutiérrez Boronat—the leader of the Cuban Resistance Assembly and a figure on the Cuban regime’s list of individuals labeled as “terrorists.”

- A word from our sponsors -

Fertility in Costa Rica is projected to fall to 1.12 children per woman by 2026, according to the University of Costa Rica

0

Q COSTA RICA —Fertility in Costa Rica is projected to reach 1.12 children per woman in 2026, down from the previously forecast 1.20. This estimate comes from the Central American Population Center at the University of Costa Rica (UCR).

The Civil Registry recorded 48,414 births in 2025—the lowest number since 2016. This figure is part of a downward trend that is also driving a decline in school enrollment.

The decision to have children is linked to economic, social, and family factors. Changes helping to explain this decline include the postponement of the first birth, a preference for smaller households, and the choice to remain child-free.

Arodys Robles, a researcher at the Central American Population Center, said that people weigh material and social conditions before deciding to expand their families. Factors such as childcare options, the division of household chores, working conditions, and the resources needed to raise children all play a role in this assessment.

“In general, it comes down to an assessment of the conditions under which children will be born and raised,” Robles stated. The researcher explained that the context in which child-rearing takes place influences both the decision to have children and the timing of that decision.

A decline in fertility does not necessarily mean that women want fewer children in every case.

Some do not reach their desired family size due to the prevailing economic and social conditions in their environment, the specialist noted.

“There are also women who cannot have the children they want because current economic and social conditions do not allow it,” Robles noted to the media outlet. The situation involves both personal preferences and the practical ability to support child-rearing.

The rate of the decline in births could alter demographic projections.

Jorge Barquero, also a researcher at the UCR, stated that the decline recorded in 2025 had been anticipated by specialists. The drop in births was not unexpected, although the speed at which it is occurring might necessitate a revision of calculations prepared in conjunction with the Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos (INEC)—National Institute of Statistics and Census.

“We are not surprised that 2025 shows a decrease in the number of births. This is something we already knew about and had foreseen,” Barquero explained to the publication. Demographic projections may require adjustments if the trend continues at a pace different from the one assumed when they were originally drafted.

Gilbert Brenes, a researcher at the same institution, warned that international experience shows it is difficult to recover the fertility levels of previous decades once indicators fall to very low values. The specialist linked this scenario to shifts in social values, the labor market, and the conditions under which women make decisions regarding motherhood.

“Even if there are policies promoting higher birth rates, they might do little to reverse or impact the trend observed over the last few decades,” Brenes said. His argument suggests that measures aimed at boosting birth rates would have limited effects in the face of long-term social and economic transformations.

The slowdown in fertility is also reflected in the country’s population growth. Costa Rica reached a population of four million in 2001 and hit five million in 2018—an increase that took 17 years.

Projections by the INEC place the milestone of six million inhabitants around 2045. This next increase of one million people would take 27 years from the time the country reached the five-million mark.

 

- A word from our sponsors -

Costa Rican Authorities Warn Child Sexual Abusers Are Often Known to Their Victims

0

Q COSTA RICA — Costa Rican authorities are urging families to watch for behavioral changes in children after warning that people investigated for sexual offenses against minors are often relatives, family acquaintances, or others within the victim’s immediate circle.

The warning follows a 48-year prison sentence imposed by the Heredia Criminal Court on a man identified by the surname Ávila. He was convicted of sexual offenses against two girls whose step-grandfather he was.

Prosecutors established that the offenses against one child took place between January 2021 and 2022. The crimes against the second girl occurred between Oct. 1 and Dec. 31, 2024, in La Milpa, a community in Guararí de Heredia.

The case highlights a pattern identified by Organismo de Investigación Judicial (OIJ)—Costa Rica’s Judicial Investigation Agency. Investigators say suspected offenders frequently have an existing relationship with victims or their families. Such proximity can provide access to children without immediately raising suspicion.

Roberto Pérez, an investigator with the OIJ unit specializing in gender violence, human trafficking and migrant smuggling, said there is no single profile that applies to sexual offenders. Complaints repeatedly show, though, that suspects are known to the children or belong to their families’ social circles.

That prior trust can lower the guard of parents, guardians and other caregivers, authorities said. It can also make it easier for an offender to approach a child and conceal abusive behavior.

Official figures show the scale of the problem. The Ministerio Público—Costa Rica’s Public Prosecutor’s Office—recorded 7,409 cases of sexual abuse involving minors and people with disabilities in 2024, based on data from the Observatorio de Violencia de Género contra las Mujeres y Acceso a la Justicia (Observatory on Gender Violence Against Women and Access to Justice). Women and girls accounted for 6,227 recorded victims, while 1,182 were men or boys.

Behavioral Changes May Signal Abuse

Authorities advised caregivers to pay close attention to sudden changes in a child’s behavior. Possible warning signs include sexual knowledge or vocabulary that does not correspond with the child’s age, sexualized play, and hypersexualized conduct.

Other signs may include withdrawal, fear of particular adults, resistance to visiting certain places, and abrupt mood changes. An unexplained decline in school performance may also warrant attention.

Sleep disturbances—including recurring nightmares, insomnia, fear of sleeping or reluctance to be alone—can be another indication that something is wrong. Changes in eating habits, such as loss of appetite, rejection of previously enjoyed foods or excessive eating, may also require closer examination.

Officials cautioned that these behaviors should be treated as warning signs rather than proof of abuse. Their appearance can give responsible adults a reason to listen carefully, ask appropriate questions and seek professional or institutional assistance.

If a child discloses possible abuse, Pérez said the first response should be to listen. Adults should not leave the child to face the situation alone, particularly when the alleged offender may be someone close to the family.

The suspected abuse should then be reported to authorities so the appropriate institutions can assess the allegations and determine what protective and investigative measures are needed.

The Ávila case shows how a family relationship can be used to gain proximity to victims. For Costa Rican investigators, it also carries a wider lesson: familiarity should never replace vigilance when a child’s safety may be at risk.

- A word from our sponsors -

Three months without pay: Caja promises to resolve payment delays for 482 workers following a strike

0

Q COSTA RICA — The Caja Costarricense de Seguro Social (CCSS)—Costa Rica’s Social Security Fund— has pledged to resolve salary delays affecting 482 employees after administrative failures contributed to a nationwide strike that forced hospitals to suspend 216 surgeries and hundreds of other medical appointments.

The Caja Costarricense de Seguro Social, known by its Spanish initials CCSS or Caja, said the payment problems were linked to irregularities in employee appointments detected during the introduction of its Integrated Personnel Management System, or SIPe. The platform began operating in July 2026.

Some affected employees could accumulate nearly three months of unpaid wages before their cases are resolved, according to Infobae.

CCSS Executive President Mónica Taylor acknowledged the severity of the disruption and said the institution must examine and settle each case individually.

“A single worker not receiving their salary on time represents a problem for the institution,” Taylor said.

Officials reported that payments for 381 of the 482 affected workers had already been processed and should be brought up to date during the first payroll period in October. The remaining 101 cases are expected to be resolved by the second half of October.

The Caja also plans to create 482 positions to formalize the workers’ employment status. Until those positions are established, their wages will have to be processed through alternative payment procedures.

The new personnel system exposed an administrative arrangement described as “nonexistent leave coverage,” under which substitutes were appointed to cover employees listed as being on leave even when the records did not reflect their actual status.

The problem extends beyond the cases already identified. A review conducted at Hospital México uncovered 1,600 pending administrative requests. In some instances, appointments had not been entered into the personnel system by department supervisors or human resources units, preventing salaries from being processed.

“We have to put our house in order,” Taylor said, adding that the difficulties also reflected long-standing administrative problems within medical facilities.

Teams from the CCSS personnel administration division and medical management office will visit affected facilities to review outstanding cases. Officials said they aim to complete the payments before the annual bonus calculation period so employees do not suffer additional financial losses.

Strike Disrupted Major Hospitals

The salary dispute contributed to a strike involving 5,685 Caja workers, including 3,061 nursing staff. CCSS figures showed that 95.4% of participants had received payments during the previous four biweekly pay periods, prompting administrators to question the participation of some workers.

Taylor said the CCSS would review individual circumstances that may have justified employees joining the protest. No decision has yet been made on possible disciplinary measures.

The walkout had its greatest effect at Costa Rica’s major national hospitals. Medical manager Marvin Palma Lozano said 216 surgeries, more than 100 medical procedures and about 350 specialist consultations were suspended. Canceled services included colonoscopies, ultrasounds and gastroscopies.

Hospital San Juan de Dios recorded 950 striking employees, while 569 joined the protest at Hospital Calderón Guardia and 402 at Hospital México. The Atlantic and Chorotega regions (Guanacaste and Nicoya Peninsula) experienced less disruption.

Taylor said only one nurse was available to cover the entire emergency department during the third shift at Hospital Calderón Guardia, a highly complex, Class A public teaching hospital located northeast of downtown San José, Costa Rica. Contingency measures prevented irreversible harm, she added.

Hospitals Begin Rescheduling Care

The CCSS has introduced a recovery plan for the canceled services, promising to prevent patients from facing delays beyond those already caused by the strike.

Medical teams will assess patients individually and consider the seriousness of each case when setting new treatment dates. Hospitals in Alajuela and Heredia, along with Hospital Calderón Guardia, have already begun rescheduling appointments.

Officials expect the postponed surgeries to be completed within 15 to 22 days. Diagnostic procedures and specialist consultations should be recovered during the following month. The institution may authorize additional shifts at some facilities to meet those targets.

CCSS officials also suspended a new set of rules governing overtime pay after workers raised concerns.

 

- A word from our sponsors -

Costa Rican content creator free on bail in Florida

0

Q COSTA RICA —  “I’m out again. I’m struggling to get the first word out. There is nothing more important to say than ‘thank you.’ You have no idea how grateful I am to you (…).” were the words of Julián Valverde, a Costa Rican content creator detained in Florida for driving with an expired license—an incident that subsequently led to his being held due to his irregular immigration status.

“There I was, locked up, and you—in one way or another—were supporting me. It was the first time I’d seen my sister in a long time,” the Costa Rican said tearfully in a video shared on social media.

The content creator added that he would like the incident to serve as a lesson and thanked those who were concerned about him, although he did not reveal further details.

“I want people to view this as a learning experience. I make mistakes—even in a situation like that—but you have to be responsible. I don’t consider myself a criminal; I just had an expired license. The law is the law. This video isn’t about making excuses; I just wanted to share what happened. My friends, the people I love, and even strangers have been standing up for me. That made me realize who is truly in my corner. I’m doing well. I’m healthy—it’s a blessing,” Valverde commented.

Valverde, detained on Wednesday, September 16, by the Polk County Sheriff’s Office, southwest of the Orlando metro area, in Florida, was released on Friday after a Florida state judge set bail at $250 for the charge related to the license—which had been expired for more than six months—and ordered that Valverde be turned over to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

After several days of uncertainty and messages sent from prison, the Costa Rican content creator confirmed that he regained his freedom after being detained and subsequently placed in ICE custody.

Valverde also stated that he would be able to remain in the United States, meaning he will not have to return to Costa Rica for the time being.

- A word from our sponsors -

Costa Rican José Flores poised to become the world’s oldest person

0

Q COSTA RICA — José Flores, a Costa Rican native of the Nicoya Peninsula, is waiting for the paperwork needed to verify his age and submit his case for official recognition, to be recognized as the world’s oldest man at the age of 119.

According to Costa Rica’s Civil Registry, Flores was born on July 11, 1907.

At such extreme ages, such claims require extensive evidence, including civil records that establish a person’s identity and date of birth beyond reasonable doubt.

Until that process is complete, José Flores remains a remarkable candidate rather than the officially recognized world’s oldest man.

To date, the world’s oldest verified living man is João Marinho Neto of Brazil, born on October 5, 1912, making him 113 years and 350 days old. The oldest man ever was Jiroemon Kimura of Japan, who died in 2013 at age 116.

Flores left his native Guanacaste at a young age and returned in 2024, having spent much of his life as a farmer and banana plantation laborer in Costa Rica’s Southern Zone.

Flores takes only two pills and a few drops for his prostate and heart. For his family, the key lies in a traditional diet and the warmth of a loving home. A widower for 23 years, he fathered eight children, one of whom has passed away.

The Nicoya Peninsula Blue Zone Association is managing the process to have him listed in the Guinness World Records as “the longest-living man in human history,” explained its president, Jorge Vindas. If confirmed, he would be surpassed only by the Frenchwoman Jeanne Calment, who died in 1997 at the age of 122.

His case is not unique, however; he lives on the Nicoya Peninsula, a region classified as a “Blue Zone.” This term designates areas of the world characterized not only by a high concentration of people over the age of 100 but also by a population that ages without developing health issues such as heart disease, obesity, cancer, or diabetes.

Consequently, Flores is part of a population in a region that records the world’s lowest mid-life mortality rate and the second-highest concentration of male centenarians, according to data from National Geographic.

The research identifying this Costa Rican region as a Blue Zone was conducted by writer Dan Buettner with the support of the National Geographic Society; the study also identified Ikaria (Greece), Okinawa (Japan), Sardinia (Italy), and Loma Linda (California, USA) as Blue Zones.

For now, the Costa Rican man will remain at home under the care of his granddaughter, Hellen Flores, while awaiting official validation recognizing him internationally as the world’s oldest living person.

- A word from our sponsors -

Upcoming voter assistance events

0

The following are the upcoming events on September 22 and 24:

  • Heredia, Sept. 22 (Tuesday)
    U.S. Embassy Town Hallplus U.S. passport renewal, notarial services & voter ballot assistance
    9:30 – 11 am, U.S. voter ballot assistance
    11 am – noon, town hall & U.S. citizen services
    Noon – 1:30, lunch & live music by Lunda (blues, rock, soul & country)
    La Galería Slow Food

 

 

 

- A word from our sponsors -

Faxing ballots from Costa Rica for the US midterm elections

0

In case someone should ask about faxing ballots, several states allow overseas and military voters to return their voted ballots by fax for the US midterm elections

Five states give overseas voters the option of returning their ballots either by postal mail or fax. Due to delays and uncertainties with postal mail, voters should ALWAYS choose fax. The five states are:

  • 1. Alaska
  • 2. California
  • 3. Florida
  • 4. Louisiana
  • 5. Oklahoma

Of Democrats Abroad Costa Rica’s (DACR) 1,715 members, 450 can vote by fax.

On Sept. 17, an email blast about faxing was sent to 395 of those members. So far, 38% of the emails have been opened, an extremely high rate. Faxing service will be offered at all our upcoming ballot assistance events.

Here is some information for voters faxing from home.

FAXING YOUR BALLOT
You can fax your ballot from home using the FaxZero website.

First, print your blank ballot. Next, complete, sign, and date the ballot. Then, scan the ballot. If your fax is three pages or less, it’s free.

For more than three pages, there will be a charge of US$3.29.

Once you have completed all the steps on the FaxZero website and your ballot is successfully faxed, you will receive confirmation from them.

Here’s a video about FaxZero: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1ICFgLLqKM

- A word from our sponsors -

Costa Rica’s Medical Association proposes that private doctors address CCSS waiting lists

0

Q COSTA RICA — Through a technology platform called UNIDOS, Costa Rica’s  Colegio de Médicos y Cirujanos (College of Physicians and Surgeons of Costa Rica, also known as the Medical Association) aims to have 15,000 private doctors handle the waiting lists of the Caja Costarricense del Seguro Social (CCSS, also known as the Caja).

Currently, there are 391,000 patients awaiting outpatient consultations and 211,000 waiting for surgery, making it urgent to take action to resolve the problem. The goal is to handle outpatient appointments—including those for specialized care—more efficiently.

The UNIDOS platform will randomly connect users with general practitioners or specialists based on geographic proximity and schedule availability, thereby streamlining the process and ultimately allowing users to rate the care they receive, according to the Medical Association.

For example, under this plan, a person living in Pérez Zeledón waiting for a cardiology appointment could be scheduled with and treated by a specialist outside the CCSS system. To achieve this, the doctor’s schedule will be coordinated with the system to identify available time slots and assign appointments.

“The EDUS system is designed to make this interoperability feasible. The technology is already available to ensure that information from every consultation is recorded in the CCSS system, guaranteeing proper follow-up on diagnoses and treatments without incurring additional costs,” noted Elliott Garita Jiménez, President of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Costa Rica.

The Expediente Digital Único en Salud (EDUS)—Unified Digital Health Record—is the official digital health platform created by the CCSS to manage patient medical information.

Under this proposal, physicians would handle the surplus of appointments scheduled daily within the CCSS, thereby facilitating patient care. The number of excess appointments to be allocated each day would be determined by the institution at all times.

The proposal was submitted to the CCSS last June, and to date, there has been no response.

“It is an alternative proposal in which consultations will be provided just as they are at the CCSS, utilizing electronic medical records, prior test results, and everything necessary to deliver quality care. Integrating physicians into the UNIDOS system is a decisive step toward addressing one of the main challenges facing the Costa Rican healthcare system,” concluded Dr. Garita Jiménez.

If the Caja accepts and implements the proposal to allow private doctors to treat patients on public waiting lists, it will cover the full cost. Patients on the waiting list will not be required to pay any portion of the fee for a private doctor.

The proposal is distinct from the Caja’s Medicina Mixta program, which lets insured patients see a private doctor for an outpatient consultation while still receiving their prescriptions and lab tests for free through the CCSS network.

- A word from our sponsors -

Costa Rica investigates alleged massive data leak of credit reporting agency

0

The Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación, Tecnología y Telecomunicaciones (Micitt)—Ministry of Science, Innovation, Technology, and Telecommunications—has launched an investigation into an alleged massive data leak of a Costa Rican credit reporting agency.

The discovery involves Costa Rican citizens and follows a dark web post in which a threat actor claims to have obtained an extensive database containing personal, financial, employment, and other types of information.

According to Gezer Molina Colomer, the director of the Dirección Nacional de Ciberseguridad (DNC)—National Cybersecurity Directorate—the issue was identified over the weekend.

Based on claims made by threat actor “jarol1488” in DarkForums, the alleged database reportedly contains over 400 million records—including salaries, addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, photographs, and other personal data.

Ironically, the company that got hacked is called Cero Riesgo (Zero Risk) and sells to financial institutions and businesses the personal information of everyone in Costa Rica, including salaries, emails, addresses, phones, marriages, etc. Image: screenshot of redacted information on the President of Costa Rica, Laura Fernández

However, authorities emphasized that it is not yet possible to confirm the authenticity or the full scope of the leaked information.

Threat actor has confirmed that data leak originates from a vulnerable database belonging to credit protection company “Cero Riesgo” through its official Telegram channel. In potentially the most serious data leak targeting civilian PII in the history of Costa Rica.

Specialists from the DNC are currently analyzing a sample of approximately 10,000 data entries released by the threat actor. Preliminary analysis has confirmed that some of the included data is indeed genuine, although the results do not allow for the conclusion that the entire advertised file is legitimate.

What is the dark web?

The dark web is a part of the internet that is not indexed by traditional search engines like Google and requires specific tools or networks to access. These systems are designed to provide a higher level of anonymity for both site administrators and visitors.

Millions of records from Costa Rican citizens have been publicly disclosed by threat actor “jarol1488” in DarkForums. Image from  X.com

The use of the dark web is not necessarily illegal; it can also serve to protect communications, preserve the anonymity of journalistic sources, or enable access to information in contexts of censorship. However, that same level of anonymity has facilitated the creation of forums and marketplaces used to offer stolen databases, access credentials, personal information, cybercrime tools, and other illicit content.

In this instance, the post investigated by Micitt appeared in one of those spaces and was attributed to a user claiming to possess information on individuals in Costa Rica.

Authorities emphasize that the mere fact that a database is advertised on the dark web does not prove that the information is authentic, recent, or the result of a single breach. Precisely for this reason, the technical analysis aims to determine the origin of the files and how much of the advertised material can be verified.

Central Bank denies a breach

The emergence of the alleged database also sparked speculation linking some of the information to the Registro de Transparencia y Beneficiarios Finales (RTBF)—Transparency and Ultimate Beneficial Owners Registry, managed by the Banco Central de Costa Rica (BCCR)—Central Bank.

The institution denied the existence of any evidence of a breach.

The Central Bank stated that it has not identified any security incidents or unauthorized access regarding the RTBF or any of its other computer systems.

- A word from our sponsors -

Opposition legislators call for the resignation of Rodrigo Chaves

0

Q COSTA RICA — On Wednesday, opposition legislators in Costa Rica questioned the conduct of former President and Minister of the Presidency and Finance, Rodrigo Chaves, during official events held on September 14 in Cartago; some even called for his removal from President Laura Fernández’s cabinet.

The criticism arose after videos circulated showing an exchange between Chaves and a citizen who objected to the security checks required to enter Cartago’s Plaza Mayor Monday night, where the Executive Branch held its traditional Cabinet meeting and subsequently received the Independence Torch, ahead of Independence Day on Tuesday.

“Why do I have to show my cedula (ID card) to get in here, as if I were a criminal?” the man asked.

Chaves initially replied that he did not know the reason. Later, when the citizen attributed the measure to the government, the minister told him to go buy “crema de rosas” (rose cream)—a common political insult and a mocking slang phrase used to tell someone to “get over it,” stop crying, or soothe their metaphorical “burns” or hurt feelings—and subsequently used the taunting nursery rhyme “lero, lero, calzón de cuero” (a childish “nyah, nyah” taunt), accompanied by hand gestures.

Read more: Former President Rodrigo Chaves mocks Costa Ricans

The incident was brought before the Legislative Assembly on Wednesday, where more than 30 legislators requested the floor to address the events in Cartago.

“That minister must resign”

One of the strongest criticisms came from Partido Liberación Nacional (PLN) legislator Janice Sandí, who argued that the official’s actions ended up overshadowing the message delivered by President Fernández during the event.

“Regarding the September 14th event in Cartago, not a word of what the president said remained in the media; instead, what remained was the display of rudeness, disrespect, and lack of manners shown by a government minister,” the legislator stated.

Sandí directly called for Chaves’s departure from the cabinet.

“That minister must resign. Ms. Laura, your speech and your words were lost that sad night amidst the minister’s actions,” she noted during her legislative address.

Legislator and former presidential candidate, Claudia Dobles, also questioned Chaves’s behavior and asked Fernández to take action.

Dobles described the incident as “deplorable and shameful” and criticized the fact that, in her view, the political sphere was not sufficiently condemning the way Chaves had responded to the citizen. She also maintained that the president should “take action on the matter” and raised the possibility of removing the minister from his post.

Criticism goes beyond the exchange with Chaves

Opposition concerns also extended to the security operation set up around the Plaza Mayor, where citizens reported restrictions on entering the civic event—a first in Costa Rica’s modern history.

PLN lawmaker Álvaro Ramírez argued that there had been an “open violation of constitutional principles” during the day’s events and stated that some people were subjected to what he termed prior restraint when attempting to enter the perimeter.

Even before the event began, legislators from the so-called democratic bloc had reported alleged obstructions by the Fuerza Pública (National Police) regarding the entry of people participating in anti-government protests.

Partido Unidad Social Cristiana (PUSC) legislator Abril Gordienko later stated that the incident amounted to “discrimination against citizens,” noting the disparity between the access granted to government supporters and the treatment received by those critical of the Executive branch.

Frente Amplio legislator Edgardo Araya expressed a similar view, asserting that, in his opinion, there were “two classes of citizens” during the activities.

“There had to be room in Cartago for both those who applauded and those who pointed fingers,” stated Araya.

Legislators from the ruling party, the Partido Pueblo Soberano (PPSO) defended the events that took place during the celebrations and rejected the accusations leveled by the opposition.

Legislator José Miguel Villalobos, who has been the defense attorney and legal representative for Rodrigo Chaves until last month, when he who voluntarily suspended his law license to be a full-time legislator, questioned the methods of protest employed by opposition groups.

Villalobos noted that the slogans used against Chaves and Fernández fall under freedom of expression, although he described them as unpleasant.

The legislative debate took place two days after a day marked by a heavy police presence in downtown Cartago, demonstrations by both government supporters and detractors, and access restrictions reported by some attendees.

The main demand raised this Wednesday by various opposition sectors was directed at President Laura Fernández; lawmakers called on her to evaluate Rodrigo Chaves’s continued presence in the cabinet.

Fernández backs Chaves

In the early afternoon Wednesday, during the weekly press conference, President Laura Fernández dismissed the idea that criticism from opposition legislators would influence Rodrigo Chaves’s tenure in her cabinet, asserting that Chaves “enjoys my absolute confidence.”

Read more: Fernández calls Chaves’s mockery in Cartago a “mistake” but simultaneously justifies it

Although she admitted that the mocking incident “might not be my style of communication,” she defended Chaves by noting that it was simply “Rodrigo Chaves being Rodrigo Chaves.” She further warned that “no lawmaker is going to influence any decision I make regarding my government team.”

For his part, Chaves, called to the podium by the President, defended his reaction to the citizen who confronted him. The minister stated that he initially refrained from responding because he considered the matter to be the responsibility of the Minister of Public Security, but noted that the man continued to challenge him.

According to his account, he had two options: “walk away and leave him talking to himself, or try to defuse his argument,” so he decided to resort to the childish gesture. “Yes, yes, I gave him the schoolyard taunt; we all know it,” Chaves acknowledged.

- A word from our sponsors -

Dollar exchange is the primary problem facing the productive sector

0

Q COSTA RICA — Mid-month salary payments, combined with foreign currency inflows from exports, tourism, and foreign investment—among other factors—pushed the dollar exchange rate to a new all-time low.

At the close of the Mercado de Monedas Extranjeras (Monex)—Foreign Currency Market—on Wednesday, the Central Bank recorded an average rate of ¢446.93, the lowest level since December 2007.

Furthermore, this marks the fifth consecutive session in which the value of the U.S. dollae has declined.

By mid-September, the dollar had depreciated by more than ¢200 per unit compared to 2022, with a drop of over ¢50 occurring in this year alone.

It is therefore not surprising that the exchange rate is the primary concern for all companies—regardless of size or regulatory regime—according to a survey conducted by the Cámara de Industrias (Chamber of Industries) in mid-August.

By this point, 13% of companies have cut staff, with a particular emphasis on free trade zones (23%) and large enterprises (19%), according to the study.

Likewise, 30% of industries have not filled positions left vacant due to employee resignations or retirements.

“While exchange rate appreciation was relatively modest—around 2.2%—for most of 2025, the final months of last year and the year to date have seen an acceleration in the colón’s appreciation of approximately 10%, exacerbating the negative effects that have been accumulating for businesses since the second half of 2022,” explained Sergio Capón, president of the Chamber of Industries.

Headache

Regardless of company size, the dollar exchange rate is the primary problem facing the productive sector.

The Chamber of Industries identified the major obstacles to economic growth in the country:

  • Exchange rate tops the list
  • Price or cost of raw materials
  • Social security contributions
  • Electricity costs
  • Competition from informal businesses
  • Taxes
  • Availability and quality of human resources in the market.

 

 

- A word from our sponsors -

Births in Costa Rica continue to decline, dropping 33% over a decade

0

Q COSTA RICA — Costa Rica ended 2025 with the lowest number of registered births in a decade—a drop that confirms the rapid demographic shift already beginning to be felt in schools.

The Tribunal Supremo de Elecciones (TSE)—Supreme Electoral Tribunal—Costa Rica’s top constitutional body responsible for running elections and managing the national civil registry, reported on Wednesday that the Civil Registry recorded 48,414 births during 2025.

In 2016, it had recorded 72,347.

The difference is 23,933 registrations, equivalent to a 33.1% decrease.

The data refer to births registered with the Civil Registry during each year, not necessarily to all children born within that same period.

Following the 72,347 registrations in 2016, the figure remained above 71,000 during 2017 and 2018. From then on, the decline accelerated: it fell to 66,758 in 2019 and to 59,286 in 2020.

That drop of 7,472 registrations between 2019 and 2020 was the largest year-over-year decrease recorded during the period analyzed.

The trend continued after the pandemic. Between 2021 and 2025, registered births fell by 9,473, equivalent to 16.4%.

Fewer Children and Rising Demographic Pressure

A recent report by El Observador, based on data from the National Institute of Statistics and Censuses (INEC), revealed that the country has 180,220 fewer children than it did ten years ago.

In 2016, Costa Rica had a population of 974,838 children aged 0 to 12. By 2026, that figure had dropped to 794,618, causing this group’s share of the total population to fall from 20% to 15.2%.

The INEC projects that by 2036, the population in this age group will decline to 607,548—equivalent to 11.3% of the country’s inhabitants.

This shift is already impacting the education system. Enrollment dropped by approximately 35,000 students between 2025 and 2026, as the Minister of Public Education, Leonardo Sánchez, explained in early September.

The minister also noted that the decline in student numbers led to the closure of some 14 or 15 schools during 2026, primarily single-teacher schools.

Postponing Motherhood

The decline in births coincides with a drop in fertility rates and the decision by many women to delay motherhood.

A report by the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) estimated that Costa Rica recorded a total fertility rate of 1.32 children per woman in 2024. This figure is well below the generational replacement level, which stands at approximately 2.1 children per woman.

ECLAC classifies a rate of 1.3 children per woman or lower as “ultra-low,” meaning Costa Rica is just above that threshold.

Over the last decade, the average age at which women become mothers rose from 23.3 to 25.6 years, according to INEC data previously cited by El Observador.

Specialists consulted by this outlet attributed the postponement of motherhood to factors such as the cost of living, child-rearing expenses, difficulties in accessing housing, the unequal distribution of caregiving duties, and the priority women place on their education and professional development.

Over 600,000 Registrations

Between 2016 and 2025, the Civil Registry recorded 607,328 births: 309,288 boys and 298,040 girls. This represents a distribution of 51% and 49%, respectively.

San José accounted for the highest number of registrations during the decade, with 212,425, while Heredia recorded the lowest figure, with 42,014. These are absolute numbers, not rates calculated based on each province’s population.

The TSE also noted that January saw the highest number of registrations, while December saw the lowest. This figure reflects when the births were registered, not necessarily the month in which they occurred. As of July 2026, the Civil Registry had recorded 28,880 births: 14,889 males and 13,991 females. San José had the highest number of registrations, and Heredia the lowest.

This figure covers the first seven months of the year.

- A word from our sponsors -

Costa Rica’s Debi Nova Nominated for a Latin Grammy

0

Q COSTA RICA — Costa Rican singer-songwriter Debi Nova has been nominated for a Latin Grammy for her album Todo puede convertirse en canción, adding another international recognition to her career.

The nomination highlights the artist’s work on a production built around songs that explore personal experiences, emotion and the creative process. With the album, Nova reinforces her place among the Costa Rican artists who have gained visibility beyond the country’s borders.

Throughout her career, Nova has combined pop, soul, funk and Latin music. She has also collaborated with internationally recognized artists and performed in different markets, building a reputation as one of Costa Rica’s most established musicians.

The Latin Grammy nomination marks an important moment for the album and for Costa Rican music. The awards recognize outstanding recordings released in Spanish and Portuguese and bring together artists from across Latin America, Spain and the United States.

For Nova, the recognition comes as a result of a project that reflects her artistic development and her interest in turning everyday experiences into music. The album’s title—Todo puede convertirse en canción—captures that idea: that emotions, memories and ordinary moments can become the starting point for a song.

The nomination also gives the Costa Rican singer a chance to reach new audiences and place her work alongside productions by leading artists from the region. The winners will be announced during the Latin Grammy ceremony, where Nova will compete in the category for which her album was selected.

- A word from our sponsors -

Fernández calls Chaves’s mockery in Cartago a “mistake” but simultaneously justifies it

0

RICO’s Q — President Laura Fernández said this afternoon that she considered Rodrigo Chaves to have made a mistake by responding to a citizen with a taunting “Lero, Lero” (“nyah, nyah”) during the September 14th events in Cartago.

Fernández noted that she does not view the incident as a serious error, especially when comparing it to other possible reactions to insults or provocations.

“I will give you my personal opinion. In my personal opinion, it was a mistake to give in to the temptation of provocation. In my opinion, it wasn’t that bad; it could have been worse,” she said during the weekly press conference from Casa Presidencial.

In justifying the actions of the former President and Super Minister (Minister of Finance and Minister of the Presidency), Fernández stated that Chaves succumbed to the “temptation” of responding to the citizen who asked why cedlas (identification IDs) were being requested and people were being searched upon entering Cartago’s Plaza Mayor on Monday.

During Monday’s event, Chaves made faces and mocked a citizen, offering him “crema de rosas” (rose cream)—a highly specific local insult meaning: “Stop crying about it,” “get over it,” or “butt-hurt”— and singing “lero, lero, calzón de cuero” (nyah, nyah, leather underpants) at him.

Fernández stated that it was preferable to engage in “taunting” rather than having the citizen—whom she described as a “provocateur”—arrested.

Furthermore, she affirmed that he is “my minister” and that she would not remove him from his post.

“It’s not part of my usual communication style, but that’s Rodrigo Chaves being Rodrigo Chaves, and I like and respect him,” Fernández declared.

Subsequently, Chaves stated that he respected the president’s position but also defended his own actions.

The minister said he would rather mock people he believes are trying to provoke him than take other action against them.

In my personal opinion, this is a load of “horse hockey” and confirms what many people, myself included, believe: where the real power lies behind the presidency.

- A word from our sponsors -

Former President Rodrigo Chaves mocks Costa Ricans

0

RICO’s Q — Former President and Minister of Finance and the Presidency, Rodrigo Chaves, had a confrontation with several protesters on Monday night in Cartago during official events marking the 205th anniversary of Costa Rica’s independence.

The incident occurred after protesters confronted Chaves and the government for requiring them to show their cedula (national ID cards) to enter the area where the Government Council — cabinet — meeting was taking place.

The former president’s mockery made international headlines, while memes portraying Cháves in an unpresidential manner spread across social media, along with negative comments, including an analysis by a psychologist.

This is not the first time Chaves has behaved this way toward protesters. On February 1st—the day of the national elections—he also made faces at several people protesting against his administration’s policies.

Among the comments were: “RonRigo’s actions in Cartago last night were worthy of a drunken barfly; his face bore the look of any heavy drinker whose addiction prevents him from coordinating his speech or behavior. An ode to vulgarity. How embarrassing!”

“Deplorable and shameful,” stated legislator and former First Lady, Claudia Dobles. The legislator added that, at times, Chaves appeared to be in an “intoxicated” state and called on President Laura Fernández to take action.

On Tuesday, on social media, opposition leaders explicitly called out Chaves’ aggressive behavior, with legislator Claudia Dobles reminding Fernández that “a minister of state can be fired”

Dr. María Ester Flores, a family psychologist and education expert, who spoke with the daily La Teja, offered a profound reflection.

“If a high school student at any public or private school in our country were to give that kind of response—word for word—they would most likely face disciplinary action, receive a formal reprimand, and require correction,” the expert explained.

“Young people will say: ‘If a former president does it, I can do it too. If he isn’t punished, I can’t be punished either.’ So, from a psychosocial standpoint, it is undermining the healthy adaptive relationships within our social environment,” Flores warned.

This is not the first time Chaves has behaved this way toward protesters. There is nothing new about seeing Chaves denigrate or besmirch a person. Nor is there anything new in seeing him use foul and vulgar language.

What did catch many people’s attention, however, was seeing Rodrigo Chaves’s face and body language. It seemed as though Chaves was beside himself. He appeared to be in a state of ecstasy, almost delirious.

His grimaces and gestures were unusual—even by Rodrigo Chaves’s standards.

On Tuesday, during the official Independence Day civic ceremonies near the Parque Nacional and the Legislative Assembly, President Laura Fernández looked tired, with a distant look in her eyes on several occasions.

Is she growing weary of the role she was forced into? Or is she embarrassed or angry about the spectacle her boss (Chaves) made of himself the night before?

Or perhaps, as one social media site speculates, “Laura Virginia is merely a puppet who, when Chaves isn’t around, doesn’t know what to do or say; she lacks a personality of her own and lives according to a script and a role already written for her. A president without backbone.”

Chaves, to no one’s surprise, didn’t show up at the Parque Nacional event. “The hangover must have been a real killer,” commented one poster on social media.

Share your comments on our official QCostarica.com X and Facebook pages.

- A word from our sponsors -

All U.S. Citizens in Costa Rica Are Eligible To Vote in the Midterm Elections

0

Ballots for the midterm elections are scheduled to be emailed from Town Clerks and Voting officials all over the United States to U.S. citizens living outside of the United States, including Costa Rica.

The procedures for voting and returning a ballot are more complicated than ever.

Vote from Abroad, a non-partisan organization, and the U.S. Embassy in Costa Rica are hosting a series of Town Hall and voter assistance events in various parts of the country in the coming days.

Below is a summary of the events.

Any event where the U.S. Embassy will be present requires those coming to let organizers know and to bring their passports as identification for security reasons. For further information and to let the organizers know that you are coming, please send a WhatsApp message to Steve Johnson at 7106 9505.

Uvita, Sept. 16 (Wednesday)

  • U.S. Embassy Town Hall followed by U.S. passport renewal, notarial services & voter assistance
  • Panoramika Café (formerly Al Chile Que Sí)
  • Noon – 3 pm

Heredia, Sept. 22 (Tuesday),

  • U.S. Embassy Town Hall plus U.S. passport renewal, notarial services & voter ballot assistance
  • 9:30 – 11 am, U.S. voter ballot assistance
  • 11 am – noon, town hall & U.S. citizen services
  • Noon – 1:30, lunch & live music by Lunda (blues, rock, soul & country)
  • La Galería Slow Food

San Ramón, Sept. 24 (Thursday)

  • U.S. voter ballot assistance event sponsored by Vote from Abroad
  • Katania’s Restaurant
  • 8:30 – 12:30

Grecia, Sept. 24 (Thursday)

  • U.S. voter ballot assistance event sponsored by Vote from Abroad
  • Mandrágora Restaurant
  • Noon – 3 pm

Atenas, Oct. 6 (Tuesday)

  • U.S. Embassy Town Hall plus U.S. passport renewal, notarial services & voter ballot assistance
  • Baruch Café
  • 10 am – 1 pm

 

- A word from our sponsors -

Marking 205 years of independence: “Let us through”shouted the people of Cartago!

0

Q COSTA RICA — On September 14, the country celebrated patriotic events, with Cartago serving as the focal point for the arrival of the “Antorcha de la Libertad” (Freedom Torch)—a tradition dating back 205 years.

However, what was not customary were the police blockades, shutting out Costa Ricans who wished to gather in the Plaza Mayor with their “faroles” (lanterns), intending to raise their voices for democracy.

Police demanded identification from anyone wishing to enter the cordoned-off area; those perceived as opposing the government were denied entry and told to remain on the street.

Adding to the controversy were the actions and words of former president and Minister of the Presidency and Finance, Rodrigo Chaves, who dismissed and mocked protestors questioning the government controls.

A group of about 200 ‘Chavista’ supporters was allowed to set up in the Plaza, where they shouted insults at journalists, citizens, and members of various organizations.

Participants in the traditional lantern parade claimed this group had been bused in from other parts of the country:

“They were brought in on paid buses, and they are the only ones allowed at the official ceremony,” recounted one participant who preferred to remain anonymous.

Evelyn Obando, a citizen who had come to take part in the lantern parade in Cartago, stated that she was barred from entering with her lantern because it bore the message “Costa Rica libre, democrática y solidaria” (Free, democratic, and solidary Costa Rica)—a message the Fuerza Pública (National Police) deemed unsuitable for the event.

Obando claimed a police officer told her the order had been issued by the Minister of Security, Gerald Campos.

At one point during the event—while the Government Council (Cabinet) meeting was underway—hundreds of citizens seeking to enter the Plaza Mayor began shouting slogans at the police line, such as “Déjennos pasar” (Let us through).

They continued for several minutes until they managed to break through, at which point the chants shifted to “El Pueblo Unido, jamás será vencido”(The people united will never be defeated), “Fuera Laura” (Out with Laura Fernández), “Fuera Chaves” (Out with Chaves), “Fuera Dictador” (Dictator out) and “Páguenle a la Caja” (Pay the Caja), a reference to the multi-billion colones debt the government owes the Caja Costarricense de Seguro Social.

For her part, Janice Sandí—a legislator from Cartago representing the Partido Liberación Nacional (PLN)—described it as “unacceptable to use the Fuerza Pública—whose sole mission should be to guarantee the safety and peace of the citizenry—to lay siege to our province, intimidate entire families, and block the path of those who peacefully marched for peace and democracy. State force is not meant to intimidate a people celebrating with civic spirit; fear can never silence the voice of a citizenry demanding respect.”

Despite attempts to project national division regarding the province of Cartago, Costa Ricans across the rest of the country participated in the lantern parades; the call to action focused on 26 specific locations throughout the national territory.

The slogan was clear and concise: “Por un país más justo, más libre y más democrático” (For a fairer, freer, and more democratic country), and despite the rain, the demonstrators turned out in force.

- A word from our sponsors -

Chaves mocks citizens at official Independence Day event in Cartago

0

RICO’s Q — Shameful. During an interaction with citizens protesting security restrictions—such as requiring identification to access public areas— at an official Independence Day event in Cartago, former president and Minister of the Presidency and Finance, Rodrigo Chaves, responded with “Vaya cómprese un poquito de crema de rosas” (Go buy yourself a little bit of rose cream) to dismiss and mock a manifestant who was questioning government controls.

In Costa Rica, crema de rosas is a traditional, widely known topical ointment used to treat skin irritation, rashes, or mild burns. Metaphorically, telling someone to apply it implies that they are being overly sensitive, “butt-hurt,” or unable to handle a situation.

He then followed the insult with other playground taunts, such as “Lero, lero, calzón de cuero” (Nyah, nyah, leather pants!), a childish rhyming taunt.

See the video by SemanarioUniversidad.com for yourself.

Conversely, Chaves’s supporters viewed his interactions as a sign of strength and authenticity, praising his refusal to conform to traditional political correctness.

I asked Google AI for its opinion on the taunts by Rodrigo Chaves on Monday night.

The response: “As an AI, I do not have personal opinions, but the events involving Rodrigo Chaves during the Independence Day celebrations in Cartago on September 14, 2026, have generated a strong and highly polarized public debate in Costa Rica.”

Seems to me that AI is a lot classier than our former president!

- A word from our sponsors -

Why Panama and Belize Do Not Celebrate Central America’s September 15 Independence Day

0
Signature: F5J5ml+XxgXIT5qQgnzC+o7iZ5btc+xmBbigo9Lb/sjEKQhqhWO7IDmujARtut5/hxDzex/LpGtqllq31NZow9gYIo2U2fDbi62Nq6Q+6Q4J21Pdmu2PJjgCz6WhkpuFmgGOF6yOoMHdKaBMDzsMa2aB2LF41i5GgmjNXUztYrNX+S8ytyFxE+wjHeufIxaHLmqkTxR+p7qICfaP8pOnFNO7VeSn6SSWYbl9a6dSZhSr1d3ie1thKsLyIzmMoiPoZOPRz/moXRjVVcIcDIMovU55+OigrAq8Q81jD+Wyf/llmcFpRYBI9pRs3iALsHkq+UkgETwkZiMRnCDZD6WdLm05qWAANjR1eJ+pnNrvDaak7GTu+DYPr5tnxbTtX6gVOTJbRSxeQ6bd/EcEkp/9u7C7J5o8uuB9vvGnl/l+Pml0clS8PYKxRAryicIkvuNN2P62HJb8mEsccxZCA3HXsTA9X08GK7OBSu7W5NJeQ4lKF9nZ0tP4WCRNWe9ifr/TBIhOkbuUDBQlwnK51nPTLwfkd8FITe/AI+jj/n74e3bs2Qr/Mat+va87L+IJEWr7UBVnZ4Hr8SCaMj2ib9L5dF6+RDxSx9Ej1TVMGUv0Asg3UoKdy5cL8g2oyWxodGSUST9CVLvqxCfMT1aEx8gkAB75xkCu54jNrpYY4h2pQZiD5zxnYQrdb4EVAWSg62qKSbQ2pTgM8wGQIp4hiXR9ICkVtVAds1a73fNbcmQ/UtKzEfvfmeNZ4NhMYNhoz/8aGAX3FAZl9aK1Wifb6AKXurW2woenytpbjS3uL+nja7PrQ+NlytbQePWJn72XPTOdgDLmP2iXai5AFlilBmHKk3oHfjuo+c29qPU+qjqC5+gMOyzNdAsb6VnD5qmbpcDE5jKTdmXPqDBLs/kng/uhy5gPxHqn1cfcreI4ojDgrRfWMmMDzWNcxbhC5nqb5bVXt92KImNrIC1IwZfAHYxdmLjqnhRSsHFI0jTmlUOfu/k=

Q COSTA RICA — While Costa Rica, Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, and Nicaragua celebrate their independence from Spain on September 15, 1821. Panama does not.

Panama sits at the southern edge of Central America, but when the region marks its independence on September 15, Panama is not part of the celebration. The reason is historical: Panama was governed separately from the Spanish provinces that declared independence together in 1821.

Read more: Mexican and Central American Independence: A Historic Backdrop for Present Challenges

On September 15, 1821, the territories of Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Costa Rica formed the Captaincy General of Guatemala, also known as the Kingdom of Guatemala. Their independence was announced in Guatemala City and later led to the creation of the United Provinces of Central America.

Image by Grok

Panama was not included in that political structure. During Spanish rule, it belonged to the Viceroyalty of New Granada, whose center was in Bogotá (Colombia). The viceroyalty also included present-day Colombia, Venezuela, and Ecuador at different points in its history.

Panama therefore followed a different administrative and political path from the provinces that became independent on September 15.

Panama’s independence came later, on November 28, 1821, and separating from Colombia on November 3, 1903.

Local leaders in Panama City declared independence from Spain after independence movements had already spread across much of South America. Unlike the Central American provinces, Panama chose to join the Republic of Colombia, then known as Gran Colombia, led by Simón Bolívar.

After Gran Colombia dissolved, Panama remained tied to Colombia. Economic neglect and political frustration—heightened by Colombia’s rejection of the treaty allowing the U.S. to build the Panama Canal—led to revolt.

That union lasted until 1903, when Panama separated from Colombia and became an independent republic; its modern national identity was shaped by this distinct history, including its ties to Colombia, its role as a major trade route, and the later construction of the Panama Canal.

Panama is geographically part of Central America. The country connects North and South America and shares borders with Costa Rica and Colombia. Its location makes it an important part of the Central American isthmus.

The distinction is political and historical, not geographic. September 15 commemorates the independence of the former Captaincy General of Guatemala, while Panama observes its own independence on November 28. Panama also marks November 3, 1903, as Separation Day, commemorating its break from Colombia.

The difference in dates can cause confusion, especially because Panama is commonly grouped with Central American countries in geography, economics, and regional diplomacy. Yet independence celebrations often follow the borders and institutions that existed during the colonial period.

For Panama, independence is remembered through a series of national holidays in November, known collectively as the Fiestas Patrias. The celebrations recognize both the country’s break from Spain in 1821 and its separation from Colombia in 1903.

Panama is, in geographic terms, Central American. It is simply not one of the countries that declared independence together on September 15, 1821. Its separate colonial administration and later connection to Colombia gave it a different route to nationhood.

Belize is geographically part of Central America, but it does not celebrate Independence Day on September 15 because Spain never formally colonized the country.

Belize’s colonial history is tied mainly to Britain. British settlers began establishing logging communities along the coast in the 1600s, and Britain later administered the territory as British Honduras. Spain claimed parts of the region during the colonial era, but it never established lasting control over the settlement that became modern Belize.

Belize remained under British control much longer, gaining full independence from the United Kingdom on September 21, 1981—a date now marked each year as Belize’s Independence Day.

The distinction matters because Belize’s national history is not a story of breaking away from Spain. Although Spanish influence shaped much of Central America, Belize developed through a different colonial path, with British institutions, English as its official language, and a strong Caribbean cultural identity.

The Seven Countries and Capitals of Central America

  • Belize: Belmopan
  • Costa Rica: San José
  • El Salvador: San Salvador
  • Guatemala: Guatemala City
  • Honduras: Tegucigalpa
  • Nicaragua: Managua
  • Panama: Panama City

 

 

- A word from our sponsors -

Laura Fernández reduces budget cuts to the Judiciary. “I won’t be their scapegoat”!

0

Q COSTA RICA — President Laura Fernández announced on Sunday that the planned budget cut for the Judiciary for 2027 will be ¢11 billion, rather than the ¢27 billion initially reported by the Ministry of Finance.

During her Sunday national broadcast, the president stated that she had ordered the reduction amount to be lowered, noting that it would represent approximately 2% of the judicial budget.

“Although the Ministry of Finance announced that the Judiciary’s 2027 budget would require a ¢27 billion reduction, the fact is, dear fellow citizens, that I instructed that the requested cut be only ¢11 billion,” Fernández affirmed.

This adjustment followed fierce warnings from Supreme Court justices, the Fiscal General, and the Organismo de Investigación Judicial (OIJ) that the heavier cuts would effectively paralyze law enforcement and judicial operations. The release of these remaining funds will still be heavily conditioned on internal audits and performance metrics.

The President stated that the release of these funds will be contingent upon meeting three conditions related to audits, legislative oversight, and management results, and that institutions under the Executive branch’s control would absorb the impact of the budget cut.

The measure, she explained, aims to secure funds for weapons and bulletproof vests, addressing warnings from judicial authorities regarding how the budget reduction would affect their operations.

The president rejected the idea that her government should be held responsible for long-standing problems within the judicial system, maintaining that she would not allow the Executive branch to be used as an “excuse” for deficiencies that, in her view, have existed for years.

“I am not going to be the Judiciary’s scapegoat… Are these long-standing problems my fault? They will not use me as an excuse for their mistakes,” the president stated.

President Fernández has been critical of the Judiciary, questioning expenses, citing the rent for the Constitutional Court building, even though only 20% of the employees work there.

Fernández also questioned the magistrates’ salaries and demanded explanations regarding the results the public receives in exchange for that compensation. “The Legislative Assembly will make decisions based on performance, based on results,” she noted.

 

- A word from our sponsors -

Limón could become the country’s first artificial intelligence data center

0

Q COSTA RICA — Limón could become the site of the Quantum AI Free Zone Campus, a data center complex, the country’s first data center specifically designed for artificial intelligence (AI) and hyperscale computing.

The campus will be built on approximately 42 hectares. Business representatives promoting the initiative presented the proposal to Limón Mayor Ana Matarrita McCalla. According to the mayor, Quantum has been operating in the canton for about a decade in other sectors.

Construction will take place in three phases. The first phase, with a capacity of 50MW, includes the development of two data centers—DC1 and DC2—along with a 230kV electrical substation, water treatment facilities and other supporting infrastructure.

The second phase will add three more buildings—DC3, DC4 and DC5—bringing the campus’s total capacity to 125MW. The final phase will include DC6 and DC7, taking the complex to its planned maximum capacity of 200MW across seven data centers. According to the Limón municipality, the project is expected to be completed by the end of 2027.

Quantum AI Free Zone Campus is intended to support technologically intensive operations, including artificial intelligence training and inference, GPU cloud services, sovereign computing and high-performance computing. The project will also feature centralized cooling, water treatment and wastewater treatment systems. Its website estimates that the campus will require a water supply of 350 liters per second.

The proposal also calls for the development of protected, redundant connections with the Instituto Costarricense de Electricidad (ICE). These routes would link the campus to the CRIX internet traffic exchange and to the international submarine cable systems serving Limón, including TAM-1, AMX-1 and ARCOS-1. The campus is also expected to have fiber connectivity from multiple providers.

The project would operate under Costa Rica’s free trade zone regime. Potential incentives include exemptions from income tax, customs duties on imported equipment, value-added tax and property tax during the applicable incentive period.

The proposal comes as Costa Rica’s data center industry enters a period of expansion, though existing projects remain considerably smaller than the Quantum AI Free Zone Campus. IFX Networks operates four data centers in the country with a combined capacity of 500 racks and 5MW. The company is evaluating an expansion and the construction of a fifth facility this year as part of a regional investment plan worth more than US$400 million for 2026 and 2027.

In April, Costa Rican company Navégalo received DCOS-3 Tier III certification for its data center in San José, which has an approximate capacity of 5MW.

The sector is also becoming more organized institutionally. In March, the Central American Association of Data Centers and Data Technology (ACEDAC) was established, bringing together companies including Ingenium, Icrea, Edgenet Data Technologies, UnitedTec, Isertec and Grupo UPS.

Separately, the Costa Rican Chamber of Infocommunication and Technology, known as Infocom, recently formed a special commission to coordinate the development of artificial intelligence and data centers in Costa Rica. The organization represents companies such as Claro, Tigo, Liberty, Ufinet and Trans Americas Fiber, and said the commission would operate according to principles of technological neutrality.

- A word from our sponsors -

Gas prices to surge in October!

0

Q COSTA RICA — Fuel prices will see a significant increase in October, the Refinadora Costarricense de Petróleo (RECOPE)—the Costa Rican refinery that refines nothing—announced on Saturday.

This will be a significant hike in gasoline prices two months in a row.

According to preliminary data, the price per liter of “Super” gasoline would rise from ¢726 to ¢764 (+¢38) and “Regular” from ¢707 to ¢719 (+¢12), while diesel would increase from ¢688 to ¢785 (+¢97).

See here the current fuel prices in effect as of September 9, 2026.

The adjustment is driven by international price trends observed between August 14 and September 10.

“Markets are closely monitoring attacks in the region and the risk that the conflict could cause prolonged disruptions to the flow of hydrocarbons. Tensions have also extended to key maritime routes used for transporting hydrocarbons. The Strait of Hormuz, through which a significant portion of global oil trade passes, remains under close watch due to the risk of new obstacles to vessel transit,” stated RECOPE.

The rates for October have to be approved by the Autoridad Reguladora de los Servicios Públicos (ARESEP)—Public Services Regulatory Authority—based on submissions by the RECOPE.

How it works

The pricing mechanism follows a structured chronological path before hitting the pumps:

  • RECOPE submits its monthly data, and ARESEP applies the formula. Because the math depends on prior data, there is an inherent market lag of 1.5 to 2 months before global oil price shifts reflect at local gas stations
  • By law, the proposed price adjustments are subject to a public consultation process where citizens can formally lodge objections or feedback to ARESEP
  • Once approved by ARESEP’s board, the new prices are published in the official government newspaper, “La Gaceta”. The prices become legally active nationwide the day following, typically at 12:01 a.m.

Fuel prices in Costa Rica are uniform; that is, there is a single price nationwide for each fuel type, eliminating local price competition. The final price to the consumer and the prices gasoline stations purchase from RECOPE are set based on the ARESEP publication.

Why Are Gasoline Prices So High in Costa Rica?

Gasoline prices in Costa Rica remain high because motorists pay a combination of international fuel costs, taxes, transportation expenses, and fees tied to the country’s dependence on imported petroleum.

Costa Rica, despite having a State refinery, does not produce crude oil, so it imports refined fuel or petroleum products for domestic use. That makes local prices sensitive to global oil markets, refinery costs, shipping rates, and exchange-rate changes. When crude oil becomes more expensive or the Costa Rican colón weakens against the U.S. dollar, the price paid by consumers can rise.

Taxes are another major factor. Costa Rica applies a fixed tax on fuel (Impuesto Único a los Combustibles), and gasoline prices also include other regulatory and distribution charges. Because the tax is built into every liter sold, it accounts for roughly 35% to 40% of the total price paid at the pump. Even when international oil prices fall, the tax and other fixed costs continue to affect the final price.

The country’s geography adds to the expense. Fuel must be transported from ports to storage facilities and distribution.

The result is that Costa Rican gasoline prices reflect much more than the cost of crude oil. For drivers, the bill at the pump is shaped by global energy markets, domestic taxation, import dependence, and currency movements.

- A word from our sponsors -

Costa Rica initiates firing of 36 officials accused of faking remote work

0

Q COSTA RICA — Costa Rica’s Ministry of Finance has launched an administrative process that could result in the dismissal of 36 officials accused of using software to create the appearance of performing their duties while working from home.

The investigation focuses on the alleged use of a software tool designed to simulate work activity during remote work shifts. The mechanism reportedly generated signals indicating that computers remained active, even though the officials were not necessarily performing their tasks, according to published reports.

The procedure does not yet constitute a final decision. The employees involved must go through the relevant stages of the administrative process and have the right to present their arguments and evidence before authorities reach a resolution.

The case has reignited the debate regarding oversight of remote work within Costa Rican public institutions.

Remote work arrangements require mechanisms to verify the fulfillment of objectives and schedules without relying solely on computer-logged activity.

Any potential dismissal will depend on the investigation’s findings and an individual assessment of each case file.

Until a final resolution is reached, the officials retain their right to a defense and are considered only allegedly responsible for the conduct under investigation.

Read more: It Takes At Least Six Months To Fire A Corrupt Public Employee In Costa Rica

Firing a public employee in Costa Rica

While it is a common perception that it is impossible to fire public employees in Costa Rica, it is legally possible, though highly regulated and structurally complex. Public employment rules are governed by a different set of protections than the private sector, designed specifically to safeguard civil servants from arbitrary political dismissals

Public employees can be terminated without severance if they violate major rules laid out in Article 81 of the Costa Rica Labor Code or specific institutional statutes. Grounds for dismissal may include abandoning their duties, committing gross negligence, reporting to work while intoxicated, or engaging in criminal conduct.

Unlike private employers, which can generally terminate a worker by paying the required severance, public institutions must comply with a comprehensive administrative disciplinary process. If a government agency fails to follow the proper procedure or unlawfully dismisses an employee, the courts may order reinstatement, back pay, and compensation for damages.

You often hear people say that having a government job in Costa Rica is better than winning the lottery.

- A word from our sponsors -

84% of Costa Ricans perceive that Rodrigo Chaves influences the government, but President Laura Fernández denies it

0
04/02/2026, Costa Rica, San Jose, Casa Presidencial, Zapote. Conferencia de prensa con la presencia de Rodrigo Chaves, presidente de la Republica, y Laura Fernandez, presidenta electa y nombrada por Chaves como Ministra de la Presidencia. Ademas estuvo presente todo el gabinete del actual gobierno. (GDA via AP Images)

Q COSTA RICA — A large majority of Costa Ricans believe that former President and current super Minister, Rodrigo Chaves, maintains significant influence over the decisions made by President Laura Fernández during her first 100 days in office, according to the latest survey by the Center for Political Research and Studies at the University of Costa Rica (CIEP-UCR).

The study found that 64.4% of respondents believe Chaves has “a lot of influence” over the Fernández administration’s key decisions, while another 19.7% perceive “some influence.”

Combining these two groups, 84% of the surveyed population—more than eight out of ten people—perceive some degree of influence by the former president over the current.

In contrast, 12.9% believe Chaves exerts little influence, and only 3% maintain that he has none at all.

According to the study, public perception suggests that Fernández’s decision-making is marked by the “extensive influence” of the former president, who retains roles of political and symbolic leadership despite having completed his constitutional term.

The situation is unusual: unlike previous presidents, Chaves did not leave the executive branch after handing over the presidential sash. Instead, Fernández appointed him to her cabinet as both Minister of the Presidency and Minister of Finance—two positions carrying considerable political and economic influence within her administration.

Fernández denies a two-headed government

The president has repeatedly rejected the notion that the country is under shared leadership.

In an interview on August 27, Fernández addressed questions regarding the power her predecessor retains within the cabinet, asserting that constitutional authority remains vested exclusively in her.

“I am the President of the Republic,” Fernández stated, before emphasizing: “There is no two-headed government here.”

Fernández has also defended Chaves’s presence in her team, describing him as a trusted collaborator. Regarding the limits of his influence, she maintained that the current minister’s power extends only as far as “the law” and “regulations” allow.

Read more: Deference or transparency? Fernández calls Chaves “president” live on air

However, CIEP results show that public perception differs regarding the extent of his prominence: for nearly two-thirds of respondents, Chaves’s influence is not merely moderate, but “significant.”

The political relationship between the two figures extends beyond the current distribution of offices.

The study found a significant overlap between those who consider themselves supporters of Fernández and those who continue to back the former president. Sixty-four percent of people who identify as supporters of Laura Fernández also say they support Rodrigo Chaves.

Even so, this figure implies that about one-third of the current president’s supporters do not identify as supporters of her predecessor.

 

- A word from our sponsors -

A complete shutdown of Western Union in Costa Rica?

0

Q COSTA RICA — On Thursday, we learned that Western Union plans to move some of its operations from Costa Rica to Guatemala, Lithuania, and the Philippines.

An employee, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the main reason for the relocation was cost reduction. According to the employee, the company had lost ground after failing to invest in technology and artificial intelligence quickly enough.

“With the emergence of new technologies, the company fell behind its competitors,” the employee said. “The company also indicated that the decline in the exchange rate was affecting its operations, which led it to choose a lower-cost location such as Guatemala.”

In a letter to employees, Western Union Chief Operating Officer Ben Hawksworth confirmed the changes were part of a broader relocation and efficiency strategy.

The transition will occur gradually over the next year and is expected to be completed by mid-2027, according to the company’s communication to employees.

Western Union will not completely shut down its operations in Costa Rica. The company said it will maintain an active presence in the country, and money-transfer services—including sending and receiving funds—will continue without interruption for customers and agents.

Western Union currently employs more than 1,200 people in Costa Rica.

The company said some functions will remain in the country, even though other roles and operations will be transferred abroad.

Western Union has operated in Costa Rica for the last 28 years.

Despite the changes, Western Union continues to describe Costa Rica as one of its key operational hubs.

 

- A word from our sponsors -

“They bought him off”: Rodrigo Chaves adds Miguel Ángel Rodríguez to “his hit list”

0

Q COSTA RICA — Former president and current government spokesperson Rodrigo Chaves added a new name on Wednesday to the long list of political figures he has criticized or accused of wrongdoing after they expressed positions contrary to the government.

This is former president Miguel Ángel Rodríguez (1998-2002), one of the former presidents who has joined the defense of the independence of the judiciary despite having faced years of legal proceedings he considers unjust.

Former president Miguel Ángel Rodríguez (1998-2002) attended the ‘Sit-in for Democracy’ on August 6 and is now on former president Cháves’s hit list. (Marco Monge/El Observador).

Struggling to call the former right-wing president a “communist,” Chaves insinuated on Wednesday, September 9, that Rodríguez was bribed with a multimillion-dollar settlement in the legal cases from which he was acquitted.

“How much are they going to pay Mr. Miguel Ángel Rodríguez after 25 years? Well, now they’ve bought him off. They’re telling him, ‘We’re going to pay you,’ three billion?… three million dollars, not just 1.3 billion pesos(sic), something like that,” Chaves said in one of his usual tirades against the Judiciary and those who defend it during Wednesday’s press conference at Casa Presidencial.

“So now Mr. Miguel Ángel, after having denounced the Judiciary for years, well, he has to go to the protest because now they’re going to give him three million dollars. Or am I imagining perverse things? Mr. Miguel Ángel should be ashamed to stand next to Dall’Anese (Francisco, former Attorney General), who framed him and Rafael Ángel Calderón on the orders of the Arias family,” he said as if it were a fact.

“Money and vested interests bring very diverse people together, even if they’ve hated each other for years,” Chaves concluded, explaining the varied bloc of opposition figures who have united in defense of judicial independence, as seen in the August demonstration in the Plaza de la Democracia.

“The situation is critical, but it has been chronic for decades. (Attorney General) Carlo Díaz is a national disgrace, and (Magistrate) Patricia Solano is his partner,” stated Chaves to emphasize that the Judiciary is corrupt.

Chaves, as Minister of Finance, is promoting a ¢40 billion colones cut and freeze towards the Judiciary in 2027, in what is seen as practically a technical shutdown of the Judiciary.

- A word from our sponsors -

Laura Fernández: “I’m not going to artificially manipulate the exchange rate”

0

Q COSTA RICA — Costa Rican President Laura Fernández dismissed any possibility of the government stepping in to artificially control the dollar’s exchange rate, despite concerns expressed by export-related industries, tourism, free trade zones, and other sectors that earn much of their revenue in U.S. dollars.

The topic came up during her weekly press briefing on Wednesday when journalist Pablo Arias asked how the dollar’s fluctuations were affecting key industries like free trade zones, multinational companies, tourism, medical devices, manufacturing, export agriculture, technology, and outsourcing services.

Fernández quickly pushed back against the idea that these sectors are struggling. She pointed to recent data on employment, tourism, and foreign direct investment to highlight the strength of Costa Rica’s economy.

She cited the latest employment survey from the National Institute of Statistics and Census (INEC), which showed 42,695 new workers entering the labor market. She also referenced tourism growth figures released by her administration the previous week, along with foreign investment stats from PROCOMER.

But the heart of her message was clear: her administration will not try to peg the dollar to a specific rate.

“As long as I am president, the exchange rate—which is the price paid for a dollar and is determined by economic conditions—as long as I am president, number one, I will not artificially manipulate the exchange rate,” Fernández stated.

She emphasized that monetary policy decisions fall under the Central Bank of Costa Rica (BCCR), an autonomous institution.

Fernández even dismissed the notion that she could call Central Bank President Roger Madrigal to demand a certain exchange rate.

“Some people imagine I’d just pick up the phone and say, ‘Mr. Madrigal, I want the dollar at six hundred pesos(sic) today,’” she joked.

She assured that her government won’t interfere like that and questioned past practices where political insiders profited from currency shifts.

“Those phone calls to fix the exchange rate for the benefit of a few close to the government? That doesn’t happen here anymore,” she said, reaffirming her respect for the Central Bank’s autonomy in monetary policy decisions.

 

 

 

- A word from our sponsors -

Who’s really in charge? Poll reveals how much influence Chaves has over Laura Fernández

0

Q COSTA RICA — The most recent CIEP-UCR survey released on September 9, 2026, measured how Costa Ricans perceive the power dynamic between President Laura Fernández and her predecessor, Rodrigo Chaves.

The perception that Rodrigo Chaves maintains considerable influence within the current government is strongly reflected in the survey.

64.4% of those surveyed believe that the former president has “a lot of influence” over the decisions of the administration led by Laura Fernández.

The survey divided responses into four levels. 19.7% indicated that Chaves exerts “some influence,” while 12.9% believe his influence is minimal.

Only 3% of those interviewed responded that the former president has no influence whatsoever over the decisions of the current administration.

The results show that the perception of some degree of influence by Chaves extends to a large majority of those interviewed. CIEP itself points out in its analysis that this view is widely shared among the population surveyed.

The study even introduces the concept of a “dual presidentialism” to analyze how a part of the citizenry currently interprets the exercise of power.

The idea put forward by the researchers does not mean that a second presidency formally exists, but rather describes the perception that leadership of the Executive Branch is not concentrated solely in the person who constitutionally holds that office.

Laura Fernández, for her part, has publicly rejected the notion that her administration operates under a two-headed system and has maintained that she exercises the Presidency and the powers corresponding to the position.

CIEP analyzes the first months of the new government

The survey, conducted during the 100 days of the Fernández administration, allows researchers to observe how the public interprets the political relationship between the president and her predecessor.

Chaves currently holds positions within the Executive Branch, such as Minister of the Presidency and Minister of Finance, a circumstance that keeps him involved in the daily workings of the government, and maintains his immunity against the dozens of cases presently being hold by the Attorney General’s Office (Fiscalía).

CIEP explained that its opinion polls aim to monitor public perceptions on political and social issues, both during and outside of electoral processes. The institution has been conducting this type of survey systematically since 2012.

The survey was conducted through 994 telephone interviews with people over 18 years of age.

The interviews took place between August 25 and 28, as well as on September 1.

The data places the influence attributed to Chaves as one of the political elements shaping public perception at the start of the new administration.

SOURCES:

- A word from our sponsors -