Monday, 26 October 2020

Sala IV condemns Presidency and Public Security for not lifting blockades

In the judgment of the magistrates of the Constitutional Court, the Executive Power failed to comply with its obligations to maintain order and tranquility of the Nation, and take the necessary measures to safeguard public liberties

Front Page Sala IV condemns Presidency and Public Security for not lifting blockades

In the judgment of the magistrates of the Constitutional Court, the Executive Power failed to comply with its obligations to maintain order and tranquility of the Nation, and take the necessary measures to safeguard public liberties

QCOSTARICA – Unanimously, the Constitutional Court, also known as the Sala IV, condemned the Presidency and Ministry of Public Security for not lifting the blockades organized by the group calling itself the Movimiento Rescate Nacional. (National Rescue Movement).

The Constitutional Courte rules that the Executive Branch failed to comply with the obligations imposed by the Political Constitution, to maintain order and tranquility of the Nation, and take the necessary measures to safeguard public liberties

For the magistrates of the Constitutional Court, the Executive Branch did not take both proportionate and effective measures to restore circulation, for which the State is condemned to pay the damages caused.

- payin the bills -

A writ of habeas corpus was filed in favor of a citizen who on October 1 tried to return home from La Fortuna (San Carlos), but ran into blockades in Nuevo Arenal, Bagaces, Cañas y Peñas Blancas de San Ramón.

After several hours of waiting, the victim said he was forced to return to La Fortuna to obtain food, water and gasoline, and to find alternative routes that would allow him to return to San José.

To aggravate the situation, the protesters also blocked the streets in Jabillos in Florencia de San Carlos and the bridge over the San Lorenzo river in Bajo Los Rodríguez. The affected party had no choice but to stay in San Carlos.

In the ruling, the Constitutional Court declared its concern about the lack of knowledge and disrespect for the institutionality, and underlines that the repeated recourse to blocking roads as a means to exert political pressure is today a deformation of the true nature of the demonstrations, originally conceived as an exercise of freedom of expression and peaceful assembly.

- paying the bills -

“The intention of those who called these demonstrations was specifically directed to paralyze or hinder vital infrastructure of the country, such as ports, land entry and exit routes and highways,” said magistrate Paul Rueda Leal, who highlighted enough international jurisprudence on this point, for example, the judgment of October 7, 2009, of the European Court of Human Rights in the case Éva Molnár vs. Hungary.

According to that judgment, such intention cannot be considered to constitute a legitimate aspect of freedom of expression since its ultimate purpose is neither to express an opinion or transmit a message, “but to generate significant damage to public order in order to obtain the intended result”.

The Costa Rican Court concludes that the use of blockades or means not provided for by the legal system – or even prohibited by it – as a way of influencing the country’s decisions signifies an impairment of the institutionality, the rights of citizens, and the Democratic State of Law.

With respect to the government’s actions, the Sala IV observes a situation similar to that which occurred in judgment No. 2019-15221 (roadblocks on route 32), since the Fuerza Publica (National Police) limited itself to seeking dialogue, but left the protesters with the decisions regarding the traffic flow, thus renouncing its authority and safeguarding the rights of the people affected by the blockades.

In summary, the Court determined that the Executive Branch failed to comply with the obligations imposed by Article 140, paragraph 6, of the Political Constitution (maintain order and tranquility of the Nation, and take the necessary measures to safeguard the freedoms public), as well as the provisions of the cited judgment.

Executive defends actions

The Government fully respects and, of course, will accept the resolution of the Constitutional Court, but it is completely necessary to say that the Ministry of Public Security and the Presidency have acted fully diligently in this emergency,” reacted the Minister of the Presidency (Chief of Staff), Marcelo Prieto.

- paying the bills --

According to Prieto, the Administration has sought dialogue but warned that, since the beginning of the demonstrations, on September 30, there have been 115 interventions in blockades.

“There are 100 police officers injured in these efforts, the action of the Ministry of Public Security has been fully diligent and prudent and the government fully supports Minister Michael Soto, the police forces and the Fuerza Publica in general,” the Minister added.

Prieto, however, said that the government agrees with the magistrates’ criteria that the blockades are a violation of free movement and a form of abuse of the right to demonstrate. He even considers them coercion against the government and its citizens.

“We call on the very few protesters who still have blockade points in the national territory to lift them to restore to Costa Ricans the fullness of their rights, which is the effort in which the Government of the Republic has been committed,” Prieto concluded.

The Constitutional Court is made up of Fernando Castillo Víquez (president), Paul Rueda Leal (examining magistrate), Nancy Hernández López, Luis Fernando Salazar Alvarado, Jorge Araya García, Anamari Garro Vargas, and the alternate Ronald Salazar.

Rico
Ricohttp://www.theqmedia.com
"Rico" is the crazy mind behind the Q media websites, a series of online magazines where everything is Q! In these times of new normal, stay at home. Stay safe. Stay healthy.

Related Articles

Security resumed mega-operations this Saturday

QCOSTARICA - This Saturday, October 24, the Ministry of Public Security...

Legislator: “There is no prostitution anymore because there is no tourism”

QCOSTARICA - In the middle of the discussion about the project...

MOST READ

Marchamo reduction enters crucial stage in Congress

QCOSTARICA - The race is for a reduction of the property tax of the annual circulation permit, the Marchamo, to be approved into law...

Fall in fuel sales due to pandemic to affect canton road works

QCOSTARICA - The 82 cantons across Costa Rican could face 2021 marked by the deterioration of local roads, due to the fall in resources...

Now your dog can accompany you to the bank

QCOSTARICA - BAC Credomatic adopted the “pet friendly” policy in Costa Rica, allowing customers to enter any of the bank's branches with their pet. "At...

COVID-19 in Costa Rica: 1,503 new cases for Wed October 21

QCOSTARICA - Following a drop in the new cases daily since Sunday, there was a spike on Wednesday, with the Ministry of Health reported...

Foreigners represent 14% of the patients treated for covid-19 in hospitals

QCOSTARICA - Of the 410,000 people with inquiries related to the new coronavirus at the medical centers of the Costa Rican Social Security Fund...

Recent trend of the R rate in Costa Rica

QCOSTARICA - The R rate of COVID-19 in Costa Rica, estimated with the most recent data from October 21, 2020, is R = 0.98...

Let's Keep This Going!

To be updated with all the latest news and information about Costa Rica and Latin America.

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.