Sunday 25 July 2021

Traffic Law Isn’t Right Yet!

Paying the bills

Latest

Today’s Vehicle Restriction July 25: EVENS CANNOT circulate

QCOSTARICA - Today, Sunday, July 25, plates ending in...

Carlos Alvarado foresees the lifting of sanitary restrictions for the last quarter

QCOSTARICA - Costa Rica President, Carlos Alvarado, in Guanacaste...

Costa Rican surfer in race against time to Tokyo

QCOSTARICA - It was a race against time for...

Covid-19 robbed Costa Rican population 60,170 years of life between the end of January and June

QCOSTARICA - Covid-19 would have caused the Costa Rican...

More than 170,000 will benefit from projects for access to drinking water in Guanacaste

QCOSTARICA - More than 170 thousand people from the...
Paying the bills

Share

Lawmakers can’t seem to get it right. The reform to the reform of the old traffic law still has defects, appeals courts have revealed in recent cases.

The Consititutional Court (Sala IV) struck down the first traffic law reform because its fines were prohibitively high, so lawmakers reduced them and all seemed right with the world. But now, a defect means the traffic judges can’t revoke licenses.

The reform to the reform keeps judges from revoking the licenses of persons driving drunk, engaging in street races and driving at insanely high speeds. Appellate judges, it seems, can read numbers, even if lawmakers drafting legislation can’t.

- Advertisement -

It seems that Article 136A of the law refers revocation of the license to the three infractions explained in Article 254B. Unfortunately, that article doesn’t refer to the infractions — instead, it is Article 261B.

This effectively takes the reckless types and drunks off the hook. They can pay their revised fines, serve jail time and go right back out on the road to sin again, sometimes fatally — the very reason the law was reformed in the first place.

The appellate court cannot make or correct a legal defect, only the Legislative Assembly can do that — judges just enforce laws, they don’t draft them. But they can read — in this case, all too well.

So the appellate judges Lilliana Garcia, Rosaria Chinchilla and Edwin Salas could maintain the jail sentence during the hearings of a driver — but were unable to keep him from driving for a year, the way lawmakers intended.

Judge Chinchilla circulated a warning to lawyers in which she recommended strongly that the lawmakers get off their duffs and draft a reform to the reform of the reform to the traffic law.

Carlos Rivas, legal director of the Traffic Safety Council (COSEVI) would like to see the Sala IV sit down with the Penal Committee of the courts and hammer out a solution, rather than have the lawmakers go through the time-consuming process of amending the error.

- Advertisement -

Comment: As an old-time newspaper journalist, this reporter is aware of errors, typographical and otherwise. He has always had the feeling that part of the problem with representative government is that it contains too many lawyers.

Any chance the political parties can pick a couple of sharp-eyed proof readers to put on their lawmaker wish lists at election time?

By Rod Hughes, iNews.co.cr

- Advertisement -
Paying the bills
Ricohttp://www.theqmedia.com
"Rico" is the crazy mind behind the Q media websites, a series of online magazines where everything is Q! In these times of new normal, stay at home. Stay safe. Stay healthy.

Related Articles

[BLOG] Costa Rican Electric Company – General Maintenance Procedures

During my fifteen plus years of living in Costa Rica, I...

Heliport, Money and Weapons in Costa Rica

Following reports by residents of Las Asturias de PococĂ­ about flyovers...

Subscribe to our stories

To be updated with all the latest news, offers and special announcements.

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.