Thursday, 9 July 2020

Costa Rica’s Lawmakers Mull Licenses for Pets

Thursday, October 25, 2012 – QNews Costa Rica | Source: Fijatevos

The difference between a bill to require licenses for pets in this country with similar legislation in other countries seems to be that it is the Costa Rican pet owner who must be licensed.

The bill was passed out of committee for floor debate last week as an addendum to the 1994 Animal Welfare Law. It would require owners to take an afternoon course in animal care, reported the national paper La Nacion.

The animal welfare agency, SENASA, would issue the license — but not to everyone, according to the bill. Those with prior convictions for a number of violent crimes such as homicide, domestic aggression, sex crimes and robbery would be banned from having potentially dangerous pets.

- paying the bills -

Those with physical, mental or psychological limitations would also be prohibited from owning dangerous pets such as pit bulls they could not be expected handle. Whether this would meet a constitutional test remains to be seen.

According to Unimer pollsters, 73% of Costa Ricans admit having pets. SENASA would be charged with granting the licenses. The bill may have been spurred along by a spike in dog attacks, especially in Desamparados.

The bill would also require that municipalities establish shelters for abandoned animals. Although all the prerequisites to being granted a license are as yet left vague in the bill, La Nacion reports that most lawmakers view it favorably.

The bill was submitted by National Liberation Party deputy Xinia Espinoza and Social Christian Unity lawmaker Jose Roberto Rodriguez. Espinoza’s legal advisor, Yamil Chacon, was frank about the thrust of the bill.

“This license is a pretext, a formality so that (owners) are trained,” Chacon told La Nacion, “because the required course will be formulated by SENASA.”

- paying the bills -

Chacon explained that what was envisioned was training in pet care such as treatment of puppies, aged pets, treatment of parasites, vaccinations, among other issues.

Commentary: This appears to be a right approach to humane treatment of animals under human care. As some veterinarians say, “The are no problem pets, only problem owners.”

However, this bill does not treat the basic question of maintenance of American Staffordshire terriers and other potentially dangerous pets nor does it create a leash law for dogs. The absence of expensive dog catchers in the country hampers protection of innocent bystanders.

Many who keep and train dogs for the fighting ring have pristine records with the courts, so escape the ban on ownership of dangerous breeds. Another problem is that not all breeds such as Rottweilers are necessarily dangerous if well cared for and given attention.

Unless the bill is modified during debate, it will still not treat this problem nor the pit bull menace. It also does not specify a remedy for a gaping cavity in local law — may police shoot a dog to save someone under attack?

The defect was revealed — but avoided by lawmakers — by the mauling death of Natividad Candida in which police milled around outside a shop back yard while the victim bled to death from wounds caused by two Rottweiler guard dogs. (See previous article.)

- paying the bills --

The dogs were on private property and police were uncertain of the legality of entering the yard to aid a trespasser. Although not only seven policemen but a night guard and the shop owner were all absolved by the court, the resolution raises more questions than it answers.

This bill would seem to offer lawmakers an opportunity to deal with liability and police duty issues. But lawmakers everywhere in the world often prefer to take the path of least resistance.

As written, this bill offers more protection to pets than people. It also avoids a prohibition on use of strychnine and other painful and inhumane poisons being used to kill strays, such as recently happened in Cartago.

Rico
Ricohttp://www.theqmedia.com
"Rico" is the crazy mind behind the Q media websites, a series of online magazines where everything is Q! In these times of new normal, stay at home. Stay safe. Stay healthy.

Related Articles

During first months of the pandemic AyA only read 3,000 of 370,000 water meters in the GAM

(QCOSTARICA) During the first months of the pandemic (March and April),...

Lack of government proposals in economic matters frustrate business sector

Lack of government proposals in economic matters frustrate the business sector.

MOST READ

COVID-19 Patients over 40 spend up to 11 days in hospital

(QCOSTARICA) COVID-19 patients over 40 years of age spend on average up to 11 days hospitalized in Costa Rica's medical centers. The president of the...

BAC layoffs 373, closing 11 branches and 79,789 credit card accounts

(QCOSTARICA) BAC Credomatic announced this Thursday, July 2, the layoff of 373 employees, the closing of 11 branches or points of service and will...

COVID-19 Costa Rica: 107 hospitalized and 245 new infections

(QCOSTARICA) Hospitalizations reached their highest number since the start of the pandemic on Tuesday with 107 patients, most of them admitted to the Specialized...

Costa Rica reaches 20 deaths from covid-19: new victim spent 20 days in intensive care

(QCOSTARICA) Sunday afternoon, victim 20 of the new coronavirus was registered. This is a 43-year-old foreigner who suffered from diabetes and high blood pressure,...

Coronavirus: Wealthy nations compete for remdesivir supplies

Zolgensma, a gene therapy medicine for treating spinal muscular atrophy in children under the age of two, is now available in Germany. However, a...

COVID-19 Costa Rica: 310 new cases Saturday, country reaches 4,621 infections

(QCOSTARICA) The Minister of Health, Daniel Salas, reported Saturday, July 4, 310 new cases of the COVID-19 in the last 24 hours, the singled...

Let's Keep This Going!

To be updated with all the latest news and information about Costa Rica and Latin America.