Friday 26 April 2024

Sex Education In Costa Rica Schools Survives Another Challenge

Paying the bills

Latest

San Jose Airport speeds up departures and arrivals of tourists in less than an hour

QCOSTARICA -- A series of recent changes carried out...

Shortage of available hospital beds back home strands Canadian in Costa Rica

QCOSTARICA  - Suffering a medical emergency, whether it be...

The Changes in the 6 months before death symptoms- Both Physical and Emotional

Individuals and their families embark on a dramatic journey...

What occurs once your nation operates on 99 percent renewable energy?

Q24N (The Verge) While most of the world still...

How relocating from the U.S. to Costa Rica’s ‘blue zone’ totally changed this family’s life forever

QCOSTARICA (CTV) When Kema Ward-Hopper and her then-fiance Nicholas...

UAE, Costa Rica Sign Trade Deal

QCOSTARICA -- The United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Costa...

Coffee or Chocolate? Why not both?

QCOSTARICA -San José is a city of surprises. Two...

Dollar Exchange

¢499.75 BUY

¢504.88 SELL

26 April 2024 - At The Banks - Source: BCCR

Paying the bills

Share

The Education Ministry’s sex education program has survived another challenge this week when the courts rejected an appeal to suspend the new classes. A petition signed by more than 300 persons claiming to be parents was filed in February against the program.

sex-edThe protest claimed the classes will “loosen the reins on promiscuity” in prejudice to public order and health.

The judge disagreed with the protest that teachers “are not academically or professionally qualified to teach (the material) and it is illegal for teachers to impart the classes.”

- Advertisement -

The petition also claimed that the classes teach that “a student may enjoy sexual relations with anyone of each sex or with several persons at once.” (Ironically, Education Minister Leonardo Garnier initiated the program this year to combat the number of teenage pregnancies.)

Judge Jonatan Canales ruled that not only did none of the petitioners present legal credentials but presented no proof that they were, indeed, parents of students as they claimed to be.

Moreover, the judge found no basis for the description of the class material that was alleged in the petition. He also noted that the Consititutional Chamber of the Supreme Court (Sala IV) had ruled last August the parents could withhold permission for their children to take the class.

That challenge had been mounted in a campaign by Evangelical ministers to scuttle the sex education program. The classes are new this year. It is present in seventh, eighth and ninth year high school students after a pilot trial in 15 high schools.

Comment: It is difficult to see the sense of this effort. It is as if the 300 signers are saying, “Let’s put sex education back in the pool halls and street corners where it belongs!”

From iNews.co.cr

- Advertisement -
Paying the bills
Rico
Ricohttp://www.theqmedia.com
"Rico" is the crazy mind behind the Q media websites, a series of online magazines where everything is Q! In these times of new normal, stay at home. Stay safe. Stay healthy.

Related Articles

“No” to sex education encourages early pregnancies in Central America

Q REPORTS (IPS) Pregnancies among girls and adolescents continue unstoppable in...

Summer vacations almost over: return to classes is on Feb 6

QCOSTARICA - Next Monday, February 6, the 2023 school year begins,...

Subscribe to our stories

To be updated with all the latest news, offers and special announcements.

Discover more from Q COSTA RICA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading