Friday 26 April 2024

Costa Rica Telecom Regulator Says Yes to Lower Cost Regional Roaming

Paying the bills

Latest

Sale of BCR, exploitation of natural gas, Ciudad Gobierno and marina for Limón could be decided by referendum

QCOSTARICA -- Given the ideological division that Costa Rica...

Foods high in calories, sugar and fat will have to include a front label

QCOSTARICA -- For consumers to have clear information about...

San Jose Airport speeds up departures and arrivals of tourists in less than an hour

QCOSTARICA -- A series of recent changes carried out...

Shortage of available hospital beds back home strands Canadian in Costa Rica

QCOSTARICA  - Suffering a medical emergency, whether it be...

The Changes in the 6 months before death symptoms- Both Physical and Emotional

Individuals and their families embark on a dramatic journey...

What occurs once your nation operates on 99 percent renewable energy?

Q24N (The Verge) While most of the world still...

How relocating from the U.S. to Costa Rica’s ‘blue zone’ totally changed this family’s life forever

QCOSTARICA (CTV) When Kema Ward-Hopper and her then-fiance Nicholas...

Dollar Exchange

¢499.75 BUY

¢504.88 SELL

26 April 2024 - At The Banks - Source: BCCR

Paying the bills

Share

ae0d933d-bcca-4dbe-8025-c00e3552ae46RoamingPospagoQCOSTARICA – The telecommunications regulator, the Superintendencia de Telecomunicaciones (SUTEL) has not found that the services provided by private operators for regional roaming at no additional cost are anti-competitive.

The complaint filed by the Instituto Costarricense de Electricidad (ICE), operating its cellular network under the Kolbi brandm, purported to show that its competitors in the mobile phone market, Claro (Mexico) and Movistar (Spain’s Telefonica) were implementing anti-competitive practices when setting prices for their services in the country.

However, the SUTEL has not found in favour of the complaint, and also “... ruled out establishing precautionary measures against competitors and clarified that neither committed practices contrary to law.

- Advertisement -

Crhoy.com notes that “… the ICE’s complaint alleges that the state company can not compete on an equal footing with other companies, because it requires partnerships to be made with other operators to provide the service as it does not have its own infrastructure, as its competitors have. ”

“.. According to the expert in regulation and competition, Juan Manuel Campos, the ICE’s complaint was admissible, since Article 52 of the General Telecommunications Law states that it is up to SUTE: to determine when transactions or events taking place outside of the country, performed by operators or suppliers, may affect effective competition in the domestic market. ”

Both Claro and Movistar have operations througout the region, meanwhile ICE operates only in Costa Rica.

- Advertisement -
Paying the bills
Rico
Ricohttp://www.theqmedia.com
"Rico" is the crazy mind behind the Q media websites, a series of online magazines where everything is Q! In these times of new normal, stay at home. Stay safe. Stay healthy.

Related Articles

Sale of BCR, exploitation of natural gas, Ciudad Gobierno and marina for Limón could be decided by referendum

QCOSTARICA -- Given the ideological division that Costa Rica is experiencing...

Foods high in calories, sugar and fat will have to include a front label

QCOSTARICA -- For consumers to have clear information about foods that...

Subscribe to our stories

To be updated with all the latest news, offers and special announcements.

Discover more from Q COSTA RICA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading