Monday 20 September 2021

Constitutional Court Declined Reducing Maximum Prison Sentence

Paying the bills

Latest

1,308 complaints about parties and agglomerations this weekend

QCOSTARICA - Police actions to enforce health regulations do...

ELON MUSK LAYS OUT WHEN TESLA WILL START RECEIVING BITCOIN

Following the series of accusations and backlash levelled against...

Top 3 Tips for Better Online Casino Security

The gambling industry has prospered over the years and...

Today’s Vehicle Restriction September 20: Plates ending in “1 & 2” CANNOT circulate

QCOSTARICA - For today, Monday, September 20, vehicles with...

Athleta women’s brand opened its first store outside North America in Costa Rica

QCOSTARICA - Gap Inc.'s Athleta brand announced the opening...

Carlos Alvarado: Vaccine retention ‘delays global solution and increases risk of new virus variables’

QCOSTARICA - Costa Rica President Carlos Alvarado showed his...
Paying the bills

Share

costa_rica_esperaQCOSTARICA – Once again the Constitutional Court (Sala IV) has declined to decrease the maximum penalty imposed in Costa Rica, which is 50 years in prison.

This is the third rejection in the last six years.

Last Wednesday, by a vote of four to three, the judges of the Sala IV rejected the claim of unconstitutionality presented in June by prison, Franisco Guerrero Madrigal, who is sentenced to 70 years in prison sentence for double murder. Despite his sentence, Madrigal will only have to serve 50 years.

- Advertisement -

In his appeal to the Court, Madrigal alleges irregularities in the legislative reform process of the Penal Code (Codigo Penal in Spanish) of April 22, 1994, raising the minimum from 25 to 50 years.

Back in 2009 and 2010, the Sala IV already determined that the punishment of 50 years in prison is not unconstitutional. According to judge Luis Fernando Salazar, legislators had set the limit to the number of years of imprisonment, regardless of the number of crimes committed.

In favour of maintaining the 50 years prison sentence were judges Luis Fernando Salazar, Ernesto Jinesta and alternates José Paulino Hernández and Rónald Salazar.

Contrary, saying the 50 years prison is unconstitutional were judges Nancy Hernández, Fernando Cruz and alternate Ana Mary Vargas. In a statement, the said the limit is “damaging to the principle of human dignity” and contradicts Article 40 of the Constitution in that no one can be subjected to life imprisonment. The “nay” judges advocate a maximum sentence of 30 years.

What the judges did agree to unanimously is that there is a “legislative failure to enact a penal law regarding restrictions of fundamental rights of persons in prison.”

- Advertisement -
Paying the bills
Ricohttp://www.theqmedia.com
"Rico" is the crazy mind behind the Q media websites, a series of online magazines where everything is Q! In these times of new normal, stay at home. Stay safe. Stay healthy.

Related Articles

1,308 complaints about parties and agglomerations this weekend

QCOSTARICA - Police actions to enforce health regulations do not stop....

Subscribe to our stories

To be updated with all the latest news, offers and special announcements.

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.