Friday 26 April 2024

Constitutional Court Declined Reducing Maximum Prison Sentence

Paying the bills

Latest

Foods high in calories, sugar and fat will have to include a front label

QCOSTARICA -- For consumers to have clear information about...

San Jose Airport speeds up departures and arrivals of tourists in less than an hour

QCOSTARICA -- A series of recent changes carried out...

Shortage of available hospital beds back home strands Canadian in Costa Rica

QCOSTARICA  - Suffering a medical emergency, whether it be...

The Changes in the 6 months before death symptoms- Both Physical and Emotional

Individuals and their families embark on a dramatic journey...

What occurs once your nation operates on 99 percent renewable energy?

Q24N (The Verge) While most of the world still...

How relocating from the U.S. to Costa Rica’s ‘blue zone’ totally changed this family’s life forever

QCOSTARICA (CTV) When Kema Ward-Hopper and her then-fiance Nicholas...

Dollar Exchange

¢499.75 BUY

¢504.88 SELL

26 April 2024 - At The Banks - Source: BCCR

Paying the bills

Share

costa_rica_esperaQCOSTARICA – Once again the Constitutional Court (Sala IV) has declined to decrease the maximum penalty imposed in Costa Rica, which is 50 years in prison.

This is the third rejection in the last six years.

Last Wednesday, by a vote of four to three, the judges of the Sala IV rejected the claim of unconstitutionality presented in June by prison, Franisco Guerrero Madrigal, who is sentenced to 70 years in prison sentence for double murder. Despite his sentence, Madrigal will only have to serve 50 years.

- Advertisement -

In his appeal to the Court, Madrigal alleges irregularities in the legislative reform process of the Penal Code (Codigo Penal in Spanish) of April 22, 1994, raising the minimum from 25 to 50 years.

Back in 2009 and 2010, the Sala IV already determined that the punishment of 50 years in prison is not unconstitutional. According to judge Luis Fernando Salazar, legislators had set the limit to the number of years of imprisonment, regardless of the number of crimes committed.

In favour of maintaining the 50 years prison sentence were judges Luis Fernando Salazar, Ernesto Jinesta and alternates José Paulino Hernández and Rónald Salazar.

Contrary, saying the 50 years prison is unconstitutional were judges Nancy Hernández, Fernando Cruz and alternate Ana Mary Vargas. In a statement, the said the limit is “damaging to the principle of human dignity” and contradicts Article 40 of the Constitution in that no one can be subjected to life imprisonment. The “nay” judges advocate a maximum sentence of 30 years.

What the judges did agree to unanimously is that there is a “legislative failure to enact a penal law regarding restrictions of fundamental rights of persons in prison.”

- Advertisement -
Paying the bills
Rico
Ricohttp://www.theqmedia.com
"Rico" is the crazy mind behind the Q media websites, a series of online magazines where everything is Q! In these times of new normal, stay at home. Stay safe. Stay healthy.

Related Articles

Sale of BCR, exploitation of natural gas, Ciudad Gobierno and marina for Limón could be decided by referendum

QCOSTARICA -- Given the ideological division that Costa Rica is experiencing...

Foods high in calories, sugar and fat will have to include a front label

QCOSTARICA -- For consumers to have clear information about foods that...

Subscribe to our stories

To be updated with all the latest news, offers and special announcements.

Discover more from Q COSTA RICA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading